From: guido@trentalancia.net (Guido Trentalancia) Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2016 22:39:01 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [refpolicy] [PATCH] Update the colord module In-Reply-To: References: <1723933090.942512.1471119061166.JavaMail.open-xchange@popper02.register.it> Message-ID: <479741768.942558.1471120741019.JavaMail.open-xchange@popper02.register.it> To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com Hello Dominick. > On the 13th August 2016 at 22.23 Dominick Grift > wrote: > > > On 08/13/2016 10:11 PM, Guido Trentalancia wrote: > > Update the colord module: > > > > - add support for writing colord subdirectories of /usr/share; > > - add support for reading colord subdirectories of /home (e.g. > > ICC profiles). > > > > Signed-off-by: Guido Trentalancia > > --- > > policy/modules/contrib/colord.fc | 5 +++++ > > policy/modules/contrib/colord.te | 13 +++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+) > > > > --- refpolicy-git-06082016-orig/policy/modules/contrib/colord.fc 2016-08-06 > > 21:27:11.337094143 +0200 > > +++ refpolicy-git-06082016/policy/modules/contrib/colord.fc 2016-08-13 > > 17:39:07.096980948 +0200 > > @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@ > > +HOME_DIR/\.local/share/icc(/.*)? > > I thought that by now reference policy implemented $XDG_DATA_DIR, > $XDG_CONFIG_DIR and $XDG_CACHE_DIR for ~/.local/share, ~/.config and > ~/.cache respectively? As already explained in a previous message, I think not all systems support the XDG variables. For example on my system they are not supported at all and I am fine with it. Therefore, unless strictly necessary, I would prefer not to change this. Do you have reasons to think that it is strictly necessary ? Regards, Guido