From: guido@trentalancia.net (Guido Trentalancia)
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 16:53:07 +0200
Subject: [refpolicy] [PATCH] Update the colord module
In-Reply-To: <479741768.942558.1471120741019.JavaMail.open-xchange@popper02.register.it>
References: <1723933090.942512.1471119061166.JavaMail.open-xchange@popper02.register.it>
	<f07ea434-9c5e-d1c2-a0ad-aebfb8070e78@gmail.com>
	<479741768.942558.1471120741019.JavaMail.open-xchange@popper02.register.it>
Message-ID: <1471704787.17584.10.camel@trentalancia.net>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

Hello Christopher.

I have noticed that the following colord patch is still pending,
although there are no amendments planned for it.

Also, the new gnome patch depends on changes introduced by this patch.

Best regards,

Guido

On Sat, 13/08/2016 at 22.39 +0200, Guido Trentalancia wrote:
> Hello Dominick.
> 
> > On the 13th August 2016 at 22.23 Dominick Grift <dac.override@gmail
> > .com>
> > wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 08/13/2016 10:11 PM, Guido Trentalancia wrote:
> > > Update the colord module:
> > > 
> > > - add support for writing colord subdirectories of /usr/share;
> > > - add support for reading colord subdirectories of /home (e.g.
> > > ? ICC profiles).
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Guido Trentalancia <guido@trentalancia.net>
> > > ---
> > > ?policy/modules/contrib/colord.fc |????5 +++++
> > > ?policy/modules/contrib/colord.te |???13 +++++++++++++
> > > ?2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > --- refpolicy-git-06082016-orig/policy/modules/contrib/colord.fc	
> > > 2016-08-06
> > > 21:27:11.337094143 +0200
> > > +++ refpolicy-git-06082016/policy/modules/contrib/colord.fc	
> > > 2016-08-13
> > > 17:39:07.096980948 +0200
> > > @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
> > > +HOME_DIR/\.local/share/icc(/.*)?
> > 
> > I thought that by now reference policy implemented $XDG_DATA_DIR,
> > $XDG_CONFIG_DIR and $XDG_CACHE_DIR for ~/.local/share, ~/.config
> > and
> > ~/.cache respectively?
> 
> As already explained in a previous message, I think not all systems
> support the
> XDG variables. For example on my system they are not supported at all
> and I am
> fine with it.
> 
> Therefore, unless strictly necessary, I would prefer not to change
> this.
> 
> Do you have reasons to think that it is strictly necessary ?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Guido
> _______________________________________________
> refpolicy mailing list
> refpolicy at oss.tresys.com
> http://oss.tresys.com/mailman/listinfo/refpolicy
-- 

This message contains confidential information intended only for the use
of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please
contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the
original message.