From: russell@coker.com.au (Russell Coker)
Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2017 03:55:34 +1100
Subject: [refpolicy] mon patch for inclusion (I hope)
In-Reply-To: <09ce5e2d-40d3-772b-b2d6-f5b8368f5a24@ieee.org>
References: <20161231102013.fnjv5qbw525cuxd3@athena.coker.com.au>
	<09ce5e2d-40d3-772b-b2d6-f5b8368f5a24@ieee.org>
Message-ID: <3053584.X41dNeeSL0@russell.coker.com.au>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

On Saturday, 31 December 2016 11:20:47 AM AEDT Chris PeBenito wrote:
> This prompts a question.  Is this pipe the only systemd named pipe?  If 
> so, the pipes should be initctl_t instead.  That may be outside the 
> scope of this patch, as it might require some systemd/init surgery.

systemd has lots of named pipes, for different purposes and different levels 
of access.

My main systemd patch is 4200+ lines.  There's lots of work for all of us in 
merging systemd patches.

-- 
My Main Blog         http://etbe.coker.com.au/
My Documents Blog    http://doc.coker.com.au/