From: pebenito@ieee.org (Chris PeBenito)
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 08:53:06 -0500
Subject: [refpolicy] [PATCH] /var/run -> /run
In-Reply-To: <201703051536.08593.russell@coker.com.au>
References: <20170305040208.uglbioys5g4k6j4m@athena.coker.com.au>
	<CAPuKSJa_5MMjacULH=0A84OQtfvbAXbnRqjT6fNNP5WyKoro_Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPuKSJbeYx+=t3NYGktWHThkhKkWjY0Y72y3jFD+EVa4MZVa=A@mail.gmail.com>
	<201703051536.08593.russell@coker.com.au>
Message-ID: <9ffccca1-16b5-6027-3474-c42ec7f8253b@ieee.org>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

On 03/04/17 23:36, Russell Coker via refpolicy wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Mar 2017 03:30:53 PM Jason Zaman wrote:
>> -# backward compatibility
>> -# not for refpolicy intern, but for /var/run using applications,
>> -# like systemd tmpfiles or systemd socket configurations
>> -/var/run /run
>>
>>
>> This has to stay. It's for when other programs do stuff with /var/run.
>> Otherwise the labels would be wrong.
>
> On Debian /var/run is a symlink to /run.  Are there any distributions not
> doing this?

I'd prefer to keep it.  Is keeping it causing a problem?

-- 
Chris PeBenito