From: russell@coker.com.au (Russell Coker)
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 18:02:15 +1000
Subject: [refpolicy] [PATCH] misc fc changes
In-Reply-To: <20170404075356.GD10685@t450.enp8s0.d30>
References: <20170402085805.2zlddx2evzcgxgop@athena.coker.com.au>
	<201704041749.35398.russell@coker.com.au>
	<20170404075356.GD10685@t450.enp8s0.d30>
Message-ID: <201704041802.15604.russell@coker.com.au>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 05:53:56 PM Dominick Grift via refpolicy wrote:
> > If at some future time we have something like a /etc/network/if-up-d
> > directory  then we probably want the same context for the files it
> > contains.
> 
> As for escaping the periods: i mean this (for example):
> 
> /etc/network/if-pre-up\.d/.*  --    gen_context(system_u:object_r:initrc_ex
> ec_t,s0)
> 
> if you do not escape the period then the period might be misinterpreted
> later on

I know what you mean.  But my definition of "misinterpreted" doesn't match 
yours.  I think that all ip-up*d directories should have the same context if 
they happen to exist.

-- 
My Main Blog         http://etbe.coker.com.au/
My Documents Blog    http://doc.coker.com.au/