From: guido@trentalancia.net (Guido Trentalancia)
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 19:03:16 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [refpolicy] [PATCH 1/2] xserver: console device is chr_file and
 not fifo_file
In-Reply-To: <201704210300.13119.russell@coker.com.au>
References: <744918107.204924.1492702640247@pim.register.it>
	<201704210240.43722.russell@coker.com.au>
	<1286385009.201283.1492706606464@pim.register.it>
	<201704210300.13119.russell@coker.com.au>
Message-ID: <120408980.202074.1492707796406@pim.register.it>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

Hello.

I thought it can be useful. For example, I am creating it through a udev rule, because generally files under /dev are created that way.

I have noticed other people are creating it from rsyslog, but I decided to avoid doing that, because I think it is not a very general solution.

Anyway, if you want to skip the two patches, that's fine, they are not particularly important...

Regards,

Guido

> On the 20th of April 2017 at 19.00 Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au> wrote:
> 
> 
> On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 02:43:26 AM Guido Trentalancia via refpolicy wrote:
> > Yes, I think you might be right...
> > 
> > I was now double-checking it and I think it is probably right as a named
> > pipe as it was.
> > 
> > I think the manage interface can be corrected and kept.
> 
> Why?
> 
> Does anyone have udev creating that pipe?
> 
> -- 
> My Main Blog         http://etbe.coker.com.au/
> My Documents Blog    http://doc.coker.com.au/