From: pebenito@ieee.org (Chris PeBenito) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 18:24:05 -0400 Subject: [refpolicy] [PATCH] misc daemons In-Reply-To: <201704191447.50649.russell@coker.com.au> References: <20170417134633.32uttndeazdcksne@athena.coker.com.au> <110fb46b-f76f-94a8-1c35-e676847228dc@ieee.org> <201704191447.50649.russell@coker.com.au> Message-ID: To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com On 04/19/2017 12:47 AM, Russell Coker wrote: > On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 10:38:36 AM Chris PeBenito wrote: >> On 04/17/2017 09:46 AM, Russell Coker via refpolicy wrote: >>> >>> allow fsadm_t fsadm_run_t:file manage_file_perms; >>> files_pid_filetrans(fsadm_t, fsadm_run_t, dir) >>> >>> +# for /run/mount/utab >>> +stat_mount_var_run(fsadm_t) >> >> Doesn't exist (and incorrect interface name) > > Does on Debian. Should I put it in a ifdef distro_debian? What would be the > correct interface name? I'm not sure what the interface does to suggest a name other than the name starts with the module's name (i.e. stat isn't a module). Regardless, I can't have a call to a nonexistent interface upstream in any case. -- Chris PeBenito