From: sven.j.vermeulen@gmail.com (Sven Vermeulen) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 11:35:35 +0200 Subject: [refpolicy] [PATCH 0/33] description In-Reply-To: <275bf92f-11fb-6206-a4b8-06759fb7539b@ieee.org> References: <1492649990.14733.70.camel@trentalancia.net> <808781969.181179.1492690424033@pim.register.it> <20170420141003.GB11432@meriadoc.perfinion.com> <960668182.196968.1492697823367@pim.register.it> <342768044.208111.1492728614697@pim.register.it> <014CCF29-92AC-489E-8248-B681BFF663DA@trentalancia.net> <8bc4f938-ee7d-76e1-cfe0-482674460e2e@ieee.org> <10734812-f327-89ed-5e7e-327eaea7b8c5@ieee.org> <9A0DFADE-16B3-4900-8BF6-620FEE8BE0AF@trentalancia.net> <994D434F-6D3C-4450-843B-DB47F7EB84BC@trentalancia.net> <1497008423.6852.1.camel@trentalancia.com> <275bf92f-11fb-6206-a4b8-06759fb7539b@ieee.org> Message-ID: To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com On Aug 6, 2017 11:10 PM, "Chris PeBenito via refpolicy" < refpolicy@oss.tresys.com> wrote: On 06/09/2017 07:40 AM, Guido Trentalancia via refpolicy wrote: > Potentially there are a few updates for this patchset... > > I have not heard anything back, none of the two options has been merged > yet, so I don't know what to do. > > Regards, > > Guido Sven, did you have any further updates on this patchset? Not yet. You were the only ones with some comments on the Gentoo-based patch set, and one of then was that you wanted to see if other comments came through. Other than that you mentioned that in some places the naming isn't what you would expect but you didn't say what that was. I'm open to update the patch with fixed naming once I know what direction to go with, as naming differences can be handled by Gentoo with aliases to make the transition smoothly. Wkr, Sven -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://oss.tresys.com/pipermail/refpolicy/attachments/20170808/00ba8011/attachment.html