From: pebenito@ieee.org (Chris PeBenito) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 19:24:27 -0400 Subject: [refpolicy] [PATCH 2/2] spamassassin: update In-Reply-To: <20170910153216.GA27516@meriadoc.perfinion.com> References: <20170910143938.3875-1-cgzones@googlemail.com> <20170910143938.3875-2-cgzones@googlemail.com> <20170910153216.GA27516@meriadoc.perfinion.com> Message-ID: To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com On 09/10/2017 11:32 AM, Jason Zaman via refpolicy wrote: > On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 04:39:38PM +0200, Christian G?ttsche via refpolicy wrote: >> - add filecontexts >> - review admin interfaces >> - enhance sa-update policy >> - remove old type aliases >> - rename spamd_var_run_t to spamd_runtime_t > > Shouldnt /run/foo be foo_run_t? I thought runtime was for user_runtime_t > ie /run/user/ stuff. I can't remember the thread subject but both are using /run for the same purposes, runtime data, hence user_runtime_t, foo_runtime_t, etc. There wasn't a good distinction otherwise since they could have pid files, sockets, etc. That being said, we should do a one-shot rename across the entire policy, rather than the piecemeal update I've been accepting lately. -- Chris PeBenito