From: pebenito@ieee.org (Chris PeBenito)
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2018 18:05:59 -0400
Subject: [refpolicy] [PATCH v2] init: Add filetrans for /run/initctl
In-Reply-To: <20180427063259.44005-1-jason@perfinion.com>
References: <20180330220754.4881-1-aranea@aixah.de>
	<20180427063259.44005-1-jason@perfinion.com>
Message-ID: <5ac3ebc3-5c7f-f847-0093-b80be6dfbc55@ieee.org>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

On 04/27/2018 02:32 AM, Jason Zaman via refpolicy wrote:

> diff --git a/policy/modules/system/init.te b/policy/modules/system/init.te
> index 8fabb0ea..aa5506ca 100644
> --- a/policy/modules/system/init.te
> +++ b/policy/modules/system/init.te
> @@ -145,6 +145,7 @@ allow init_t init_var_run_t:file manage_lnk_file_perms;
>   
>   allow init_t initctl_t:fifo_file manage_fifo_file_perms;
>   dev_filetrans(init_t, initctl_t, fifo_file)
> +files_pid_filetrans(init_t, initctl_t, fifo_file, "initctl")

Is the name really needed?  I don't see any type_transition conflicts.

-- 
Chris PeBenito