Incorrect num_elem parameter value (1 vs. 5) was used in the
aes_siv_encrypt() call. This resulted in only the first one of the five
AAD vectors to SIV getting included in calculation. This does not
protect all the contents correctly and would not interoperate with a
standard compliant implementation.
Fix this by using the correct number. A matching fix is needed in the AP
side (hostapd) to get FILS authentication working properly.
Fixes: 39404feee691 ("mac80211: FILS AEAD protection for station mode association frames")
Reported-by: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <[email protected]>
---
net/mac80211/fils_aead.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
If there is still time, it would be nice to get this included in Linux
4.10 since fils_aead.c is being added there. If not, Cc: stable could be
added.
diff --git a/net/mac80211/fils_aead.c b/net/mac80211/fils_aead.c
index ecfdd97..e795aaa 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/fils_aead.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/fils_aead.c
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ int fils_encrypt_assoc_req(struct sk_buff *skb,
crypt_len = skb->data + skb->len - encr;
skb_put(skb, AES_BLOCK_SIZE);
return aes_siv_encrypt(assoc_data->fils_kek, assoc_data->fils_kek_len,
- encr, crypt_len, 1, addr, len, encr);
+ encr, crypt_len, 5, addr, len, encr);
}
int fils_decrypt_assoc_resp(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
--
2.7.4
On Sat, 2017-02-04 at 13:59 +0200, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> Incorrect num_elem parameter value (1 vs. 5) was used in the
> aes_siv_encrypt() call. This resulted in only the first one of the
> five
> AAD vectors to SIV getting included in calculation. This does not
> protect all the contents correctly and would not interoperate with a
> standard compliant implementation.
>
> Fix this by using the correct number. A matching fix is needed in the
> AP
> side (hostapd) to get FILS authentication working properly.
Applied, thanks.
johannes