2011-12-14 20:02:32

by Randy Dunlap

[permalink] [raw]

Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 14 (phy vs. bcma)

---

On 12/13/2011 11:26 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20111213:


drivers/built-in.o: In function `b43_nphy_pmu_spur_avoid.clone.8':
phy_n.c:(.text+0x1589d8): undefined reference to `bcma_chipco_pll_write'
phy_n.c:(.text+0x1589e9): undefined reference to `bcma_chipco_pll_write'
phy_n.c:(.text+0x1589fa): undefined reference to `bcma_chipco_pll_write'
phy_n.c:(.text+0x158a08): undefined reference to `bcma_chipco_pll_write'
phy_n.c:(.text+0x158a1d): undefined reference to `bcma_chipco_pll_write'
drivers/built-in.o:phy_n.c:(.text+0x158a2e): more undefined references to `bcma_chipco_pll_write' follow


BCMA is not enabled.
Full randconfig file is attached.


--
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

---

Attachments:

config-r3344 (60.92 kB)

2011-12-14 20:15:24

by John W. Linville

[permalink] [raw]

Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 14 (phy vs. bcma)

---

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 01:01:37PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 12/13/2011 11:26 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20111213:
>
>
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `b43_nphy_pmu_spur_avoid.clone.8':
> phy_n.c:(.text+0x1589d8): undefined reference to `bcma_chipco_pll_write'
> phy_n.c:(.text+0x1589e9): undefined reference to `bcma_chipco_pll_write'
> phy_n.c:(.text+0x1589fa): undefined reference to `bcma_chipco_pll_write'
> phy_n.c:(.text+0x158a08): undefined reference to `bcma_chipco_pll_write'
> phy_n.c:(.text+0x158a1d): undefined reference to `bcma_chipco_pll_write'
> drivers/built-in.o:phy_n.c:(.text+0x158a2e): more undefined references to `bcma_chipco_pll_write' follow
>
>
> BCMA is not enabled.
> Full randconfig file is attached.

I've already merged a patch to address this.

Thanks,

John
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
[email protected] might be all we have. Be ready.