2016-07-13 11:54:11

by Yaniv Machani

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2] mac80211: rx: frames received out of order

From: Meirav Kama <[email protected]>

Upon forwarding frames from Rx to Tx in mesh, driver clones the skb.
It zeros the tx_info and doesn't set hw_queue correctly. It then enqueues
the frame in queue 0 (VOICE) instead of the correct queue.
Upon re-queue of this frame, driver inserts it to the correct queue (e.g. BE).
After that, driver dequeue frames from 2 different queues and sends them out of order.
To fix this, driver will set the tx_info->hw_queue to the correct queue when cloning the skb.

Signed-off-by: Meirav Kama <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Yaniv Machani <[email protected]>
---
V2 - Revised comment

net/mac80211/rx.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/net/mac80211/rx.c b/net/mac80211/rx.c
index 9a1eb70..88dc744 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/rx.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/rx.c
@@ -2392,6 +2392,7 @@ ieee80211_rx_h_mesh_fwding(struct ieee80211_rx_data *rx)
info->flags |= IEEE80211_TX_INTFL_NEED_TXPROCESSING;
info->control.vif = &rx->sdata->vif;
info->control.jiffies = jiffies;
+ info->hw_queue = q;
if (is_multicast_ether_addr(fwd_hdr->addr1)) {
IEEE80211_IFSTA_MESH_CTR_INC(ifmsh, fwded_mcast);
memcpy(fwd_hdr->addr2, sdata->vif.addr, ETH_ALEN);
--
2.9.0



2016-08-02 08:32:13

by Johannes Berg

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mac80211: rx: frames received out of order

On Wed, 2016-07-13 at 14:57 +0300, Yaniv Machani wrote:
> From: Meirav Kama <[email protected]>
>
> Upon forwarding frames from Rx to Tx in mesh, driver clones the skb.
> It zeros the tx_info and doesn't set hw_queue correctly. It then
> enqueues
> the frame in queue 0 (VOICE) instead of the correct queue.
> Upon re-queue of this frame, driver inserts it to the correct queue
> (e.g. BE).
> After that, driver dequeue frames from 2 different queues and sends
> them out of order.
> To fix this, driver will set the tx_info->hw_queue to the correct
> queue when cloning the skb.
>
Makes sense, but the subject is a bit misleading - can you come up with
a better one?

johannes