samirweng1979 <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: wengjianfeng <[email protected]>
>
> -ENOMEM has been used as a return value,it is not necessary to
> assign it, and if kzalloc fail,not need free it,so just return
> -ENOMEM when kzalloc fail.
>
> Signed-off-by: wengjianfeng <[email protected]>
You sent the previous version just five days ago:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/[email protected]/
We maintainers are busy and usually takes some time to review the patch. So
please avoid resending patches in such short intervals.
Patch set to Superseded.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/[email protected]/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches