LinuxLists.cc - [PATCH V6 0/9] Enable Wifi RFI interference mitigation feature support

2023-07-10 08:40:19

Subject: [PATCH V6 0/9] Enable Wifi RFI interference mitigation feature support

2023-07-10 08:40:42

Subject: [PATCH V6 2/9] driver core: add ACPI based WBRF mechanism introduced by AMD

AMD has introduced an ACPI based mechanism to support WBRF for some
platforms with AMD dGPU + WLAN. This needs support from BIOS equipped
with necessary AML implementations and dGPU firmwares.

For those systems without the ACPI mechanism and developing solutions,
user can use the generic WBRF solution for diagnosing potential
interference issues.

Co-developed-by: Mario Limonciello <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <[email protected]>
Co-developed-by: Evan Quan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <[email protected]>
--
v4->v5:
- promote this to be a more generic solution with input argument taking
`struct device` and provide better scalability to support non-ACPI
scenarios(Andrew)
- update the APIs naming and some other minor fixes(Rafael)
v5->v6:
- make the code more readable and some other fixes(Andrew)
---
drivers/acpi/Makefile | 2 +
drivers/acpi/amd_wbrf.c | 269 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/base/Kconfig | 29 ++++
drivers/base/wbrf.c | 35 ++++-
include/linux/acpi_amd_wbrf.h | 24 +++
include/linux/wbrf.h | 2 +
6 files changed, 355 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/amd_wbrf.c
create mode 100644 include/linux/acpi_amd_wbrf.h

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Makefile b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
index feb36c0b9446..94b940ddbf88 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
@@ -131,3 +131,5 @@ obj-y += dptf/
obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64) += arm64/

obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_VIOT) += viot.o
+
+obj-$(CONFIG_WBRF_AMD_ACPI) += amd_wbrf.o
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/amd_wbrf.c b/drivers/acpi/amd_wbrf.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..481b1c180a09
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/acpi/amd_wbrf.c
@@ -0,0 +1,269 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Wifi Band Exclusion Interface (AMD ACPI Implementation)
+ * Copyright (C) 2023 Advanced Micro Devices
+ *
+ */
+
+#include <linux/acpi.h>
+#include <linux/acpi_amd_wbrf.h>
+
+/*
+ * Functions bit vector for WBRF method
+ *
+ * Bit 0: Supported for any functions other than function 0.
+ * Bit 1: Function 1 (Add / Remove frequency) is supported.
+ * Bit 2: Function 2 (Get frequency list) is supported.
+ */
+#define WBRF_SUPPORT_OTHER_FUNCTION 0x0
+#define WBRF_RECORD 0x1
+#define WBRF_RETRIEVE 0x2
+
+/* record actions */
+#define WBRF_RECORD_ADD 0x0
+#define WBRF_RECORD_REMOVE 0x1
+
+#define WBRF_REVISION 0x1
+
+static const guid_t wifi_acpi_dsm_guid =
+ GUID_INIT(0x7b7656cf, 0xdc3d, 0x4c1c,
+ 0x83, 0xe9, 0x66, 0xe7, 0x21, 0xde, 0x30, 0x70);
+
+static int wbrf_dsm(struct acpi_device *adev, u8 fn,
+ union acpi_object *argv4,
+ union acpi_object **out)
+{
+ union acpi_object *obj;
+ int rc;
+
+ obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(adev->handle, &wifi_acpi_dsm_guid,
+ WBRF_REVISION, fn, argv4);
+ if (!obj)
+ return -ENXIO;
+
+ switch (obj->type) {
+ case ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER:
+ *out = obj;
+ return 0;
+
+ case ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER:
+ rc = obj->integer.value ? -EINVAL : 0;
+ break;
+
+ default:
+ rc = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ }
+
+ ACPI_FREE(obj);
+
+ return rc;
+}
+
+static int wbrf_record(struct acpi_device *adev, uint8_t action,
+ struct wbrf_ranges_in *in)
+{
+ union acpi_object argv4;
+ union acpi_object *tmp;
+ u32 num_of_ranges = 0;
+ u32 num_of_elements;
+ u32 arg_idx = 0;
+ u32 loop_idx;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!in)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ for (loop_idx = 0; loop_idx < ARRAY_SIZE(in->band_list);
+ loop_idx++)
+ if (in->band_list[loop_idx].start &&
+ in->band_list[loop_idx].end)
+ num_of_ranges++;
+
+ /*
+ * Every range comes with two end points(start and end) and
+ * each of them is accounted as an element. Meanwhile the range
+ * count and action type are accounted as an element each.
+ * So, the total element count = 2 * num_of_ranges + 1 + 1.
+ */
+ num_of_elements = 2 * num_of_ranges + 1 + 1;
+
+ tmp = kcalloc(num_of_elements, sizeof(*tmp), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!tmp)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ argv4.package.type = ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE;
+ argv4.package.count = num_of_elements;
+ argv4.package.elements = tmp;
+
+ tmp[arg_idx].integer.type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
+ tmp[arg_idx++].integer.value = num_of_ranges;
+ tmp[arg_idx].integer.type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
+ tmp[arg_idx++].integer.value = action;
+
+ for (loop_idx = 0; loop_idx < ARRAY_SIZE(in->band_list);
+ loop_idx++) {
+ if (!in->band_list[loop_idx].start ||
+ !in->band_list[loop_idx].end)
+ continue;
+
+ tmp[arg_idx].integer.type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
+ tmp[arg_idx++].integer.value = in->band_list[loop_idx].start;
+ tmp[arg_idx].integer.type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
+ tmp[arg_idx++].integer.value = in->band_list[loop_idx].end;
+ }
+
+ ret = wbrf_dsm(adev, WBRF_RECORD, &argv4, NULL);
+
+ kfree(tmp);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+int acpi_amd_wbrf_add_exclusion(struct device *dev,
+ struct wbrf_ranges_in *in)
+{
+ struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
+
+ if (!adev)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ return wbrf_record(adev, WBRF_RECORD_ADD, in);
+}
+
+int acpi_amd_wbrf_remove_exclusion(struct device *dev,
+ struct wbrf_ranges_in *in)
+{
+ struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
+
+ if (!adev)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ return wbrf_record(adev, WBRF_RECORD_REMOVE, in);
+}
+
+bool acpi_amd_wbrf_supported_producer(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
+
+ if (!adev)
+ return false;
+
+ return acpi_check_dsm(adev->handle, &wifi_acpi_dsm_guid,
+ WBRF_REVISION,
+ BIT(WBRF_RECORD));
+}
+
+static union acpi_object *
+acpi_evaluate_wbrf(acpi_handle handle, u64 rev, u64 func)
+{
+ acpi_status ret;
+ struct acpi_buffer buf = {ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL};
+ union acpi_object params[4];
+ struct acpi_object_list input = {
+ .count = 4,
+ .pointer = params,
+ };
+
+ params[0].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
+ params[0].integer.value = rev;
+ params[1].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
+ params[1].integer.value = func;
+ params[2].type = ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE;
+ params[2].package.count = 0;
+ params[2].package.elements = NULL;
+ params[3].type = ACPI_TYPE_STRING;
+ params[3].string.length = 0;
+ params[3].string.pointer = NULL;
+
+ ret = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "WBRF", &input, &buf);
+ if (ACPI_SUCCESS(ret))
+ return (union acpi_object *)buf.pointer;
+
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static bool check_acpi_wbrf(acpi_handle handle, u64 rev, u64 funcs)
+{
+ int i;
+ u64 mask = 0;
+ union acpi_object *obj;
+
+ if (funcs == 0)
+ return false;
+
+ obj = acpi_evaluate_wbrf(handle, rev, 0);
+ if (!obj)
+ return false;
+
+ if (obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER)
+ return false;
+
+ /*
+ * Bit vector providing supported functions information.
+ * Each bit marks support for one specific function of the WBRF method.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < obj->buffer.length && i < 8; i++)
+ mask |= (((u64)obj->buffer.pointer[i]) << (i * 8));
+
+ ACPI_FREE(obj);
+
+ if ((mask & BIT(WBRF_SUPPORT_OTHER_FUNCTION)) &&
+ (mask & funcs) == funcs)
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+bool acpi_amd_wbrf_supported_consumer(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
+
+ if (!adev)
+ return false;
+
+ return check_acpi_wbrf(adev->handle,
+ WBRF_REVISION,
+ BIT(WBRF_RETRIEVE));
+}
+
+int acpi_amd_wbrf_retrieve_exclusions(struct device *dev,
+ struct wbrf_ranges_out *out)
+{
+ struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
+ union acpi_object *obj;
+
+ if (!adev)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ obj = acpi_evaluate_wbrf(adev->handle,
+ WBRF_REVISION,
+ WBRF_RETRIEVE);
+ if (!obj)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ /*
+ * The return buffer is with variable length and the format below:
+ * number_of_entries(1 DWORD): Number of entries
+ * start_freq of 1st entry(1 QWORD): Start frequency of the 1st entry
+ * end_freq of 1st entry(1 QWORD): End frequency of the 1st entry
+ * ...
+ * ...
+ * start_freq of the last entry(1 QWORD)
+ * end_freq of the last entry(1 QWORD)
+ *
+ * Thus the buffer length is determined by the number of entries.
+ * - For zero entry scenario, the buffer length will be 4 bytes.
+ * - For one entry scenario, the buffer length will be 20 bytes.
+ */
+ if (obj->buffer.length > sizeof(*out) ||
+ obj->buffer.length < 4) {
+ dev_err(dev, "BIOS FUBAR, ignoring wrong sized WBRT information");
+ ACPI_FREE(obj);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ memcpy(out, obj->buffer.pointer, obj->buffer.length);
+
+ ACPI_FREE(obj);
+
+ return 0;
+}
diff --git a/drivers/base/Kconfig b/drivers/base/Kconfig
index 5b441017b225..cbf0b2358c17 100644
--- a/drivers/base/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/base/Kconfig
@@ -250,4 +250,33 @@ config WBRF
different domains to notify the frequencies in use so that hardware
can be reconfigured to avoid harmonic conflicts.

+config WBRF_AMD_ACPI
+ bool "Use the ACPI mechanism introduced by AMD to support WBRF"
+ default n
+ depends on ACPI
+ select WBRF
+ help
+ AMD has introduced an ACPI based mechanism to support WBRF for some
+ platforms with AMD dGPU and WLAN. This needs support from BIOS equipped
+ with necessary AML implementations and dGPU firmwares.
+
+ Say Y to enable this ACPI based mechanism. It is suggested to confirm
+ with the hardware designer/provider first whether your platform
+ equipped with necessary BIOS and firmwares.
+
+config WBRF_GENERIC
+ bool "Use the generic WBRF solution"
+ default n
+ depends on !WBRF_AMD_ACPI
+ select WBRF
+ help
+ Ideally it is the hardware designer/provider who should provide a
+ solution for the possible RF interference issue. Since they know
+ well whether there could be RF interference issue with their
+ platforms.
+
+ Say Y to enable this generic WBRF solution for diagnosing potential
+ interference issues on systems without the ACPI mechanism and
+ developing solutions.
+
endmenu
diff --git a/drivers/base/wbrf.c b/drivers/base/wbrf.c
index 2163a8ec8a9a..401c6da86618 100644
--- a/drivers/base/wbrf.c
+++ b/drivers/base/wbrf.c
@@ -6,9 +6,12 @@
*/

#include <linux/wbrf.h>
+#include <linux/acpi_amd_wbrf.h>

static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(wbrf_chain_head);
static DEFINE_MUTEX(wbrf_mutex);
+
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_WBRF_GENERIC)
static struct exclusion_range_pool wbrf_pool;

static int _wbrf_add_exclusion_ranges(struct wbrf_ranges_in *in)
@@ -89,6 +92,7 @@ static int _wbrf_retrieve_exclusion_ranges(struct wbrf_ranges_out *out)

return 0;
}
+#endif

/**
* wbrf_supported_producer - Determine if the device can report frequencies
@@ -100,7 +104,12 @@ static int _wbrf_retrieve_exclusion_ranges(struct wbrf_ranges_out *out)
*/
bool wbrf_supported_producer(struct device *dev)
{
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_WBRF_AMD_ACPI)
+ return acpi_amd_wbrf_supported_producer(dev);
+#elif IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_WBRF_GENERIC)
return true;
+#endif
+ return false;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wbrf_supported_producer);

@@ -116,12 +125,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wbrf_supported_producer);
int wbrf_add_exclusion(struct device *dev,
struct wbrf_ranges_in *in)
{
- int r;
+ int r = -ENODEV;

mutex_lock(&wbrf_mutex);

+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_WBRF_AMD_ACPI)
+ r = acpi_amd_wbrf_add_exclusion(dev, in);
+#elif IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_WBRF_GENERIC)
r = _wbrf_add_exclusion_ranges(in);
-
+#endif
mutex_unlock(&wbrf_mutex);
if (r)
return r;
@@ -144,12 +156,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wbrf_add_exclusion);
int wbrf_remove_exclusion(struct device *dev,
struct wbrf_ranges_in *in)
{
- int r;
+ int r = -ENODEV;

mutex_lock(&wbrf_mutex);

+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_WBRF_AMD_ACPI)
+ r = acpi_amd_wbrf_remove_exclusion(dev, in);
+#elif IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_WBRF_GENERIC)
r = _wbrf_remove_exclusion_ranges(in);
-
+#endif
mutex_unlock(&wbrf_mutex);
if (r)
return r;
@@ -171,7 +186,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wbrf_remove_exclusion);
*/
bool wbrf_supported_consumer(struct device *dev)
{
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_WBRF_AMD_ACPI)
+ return acpi_amd_wbrf_supported_consumer(dev);
+#elif IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_WBRF_GENERIC)
return true;
+#endif
+ return false;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wbrf_supported_consumer);

@@ -214,12 +234,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wbrf_unregister_notifier);
int wbrf_retrieve_exclusions(struct device *dev,
struct wbrf_ranges_out *out)
{
- int r;
+ int r = -ENODEV;

mutex_lock(&wbrf_mutex);

+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_WBRF_AMD_ACPI)
+ r = acpi_amd_wbrf_retrieve_exclusions(dev, out);
+#elif IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_WBRF_GENERIC)
r = _wbrf_retrieve_exclusion_ranges(out);
-
+#endif
mutex_unlock(&wbrf_mutex);

return r;
diff --git a/include/linux/acpi_amd_wbrf.h b/include/linux/acpi_amd_wbrf.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..18b3d39b6abe
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/acpi_amd_wbrf.h
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Wifi Band Exclusion Interface (AMD ACPI Implementation)
+ * Copyright (C) 2023 Advanced Micro Devices
+ *
+ */
+
+#ifndef _ACPI_AMD_WBRF_H
+#define _ACPI_AMD_WBRF_H
+
+#include <linux/wbrf.h>
+
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_WBRF_AMD_ACPI)
+bool acpi_amd_wbrf_supported_consumer(struct device *dev);
+bool acpi_amd_wbrf_supported_producer(struct device *dev);
+int acpi_amd_wbrf_remove_exclusion(struct device *dev,
+ struct wbrf_ranges_in *in);
+int acpi_amd_wbrf_add_exclusion(struct device *dev,
+ struct wbrf_ranges_in *in);
+int acpi_amd_wbrf_retrieve_exclusions(struct device *dev,
+ struct wbrf_ranges_out *out);
+#endif
+
+#endif /* _ACPI_AMD_WBRF_H */
diff --git a/include/linux/wbrf.h b/include/linux/wbrf.h
index 32c017232874..7e627ef34c33 100644
--- a/include/linux/wbrf.h
+++ b/include/linux/wbrf.h
@@ -18,10 +18,12 @@ struct exclusion_range {
u64 end;
};

+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_WBRF_GENERIC)
struct exclusion_range_pool {
struct exclusion_range band_list[MAX_NUM_OF_WBRF_RANGES];
u64 ref_counter[MAX_NUM_OF_WBRF_RANGES];
};
+#endif

struct wbrf_ranges_in {
/* valid entry: `start` and `end` filled with non-zero values */
--
2.34.1

2023-07-10 08:40:47

by Evan Quan

[permalink] [raw]

Subject: [PATCH V6 1/9] drivers core: Add support for Wifi band RF mitigations

Due to electrical and mechanical constraints in certain platform designs
there may be likely interference of relatively high-powered harmonics of
the (G-)DDR memory clocks with local radio module frequency bands used
by Wifi 6/6e/7.

To mitigate this, AMD has introduced a mechanism that devices can use to
notify active use of particular frequencies so that other devices can make
relative internal adjustments as necessary to avoid this resonance.

In order for a device to support this, the expected flow for device
driver or subsystems:

Drivers/subsystems contributing frequencies:

1) During probe, check `wbrf_supported_producer` to see if WBRF supported
for the device.
2) If adding frequencies, then call `wbrf_add_exclusion` with the
start and end ranges of the frequencies.
3) If removing frequencies, then call `wbrf_remove_exclusion` with
start and end ranges of the frequencies.

Drivers/subsystems responding to frequencies:

1) During probe, check `wbrf_supported_consumer` to see if WBRF is supported
for the device.
2) Call the `wbrf_retrieve_exclusions` to retrieve the current
exclusions on receiving an ACPI notification for a new frequency
change.

Co-developed-by: Mario Limonciello <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <[email protected]>
Co-developed-by: Evan Quan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <[email protected]>
--
v4->v5:
- promote this to be a more generic solution with input argument taking
`struct device` and provide better scalability to support non-ACPI
scenarios(Andrew)
- update the APIs naming and some other minor fixes(Rafael)
---
drivers/base/Kconfig | 8 ++
drivers/base/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/base/wbrf.c | 227 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/wbrf.h | 70 +++++++++++++
4 files changed, 306 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/base/wbrf.c
create mode 100644 include/linux/wbrf.h

diff --git a/drivers/base/Kconfig b/drivers/base/Kconfig
index 2b8fd6bb7da0..5b441017b225 100644
--- a/drivers/base/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/base/Kconfig
@@ -242,4 +242,12 @@ config FW_DEVLINK_SYNC_STATE_TIMEOUT
command line option on every system/board your kernel is expected to
work on.

+config WBRF
+ bool "Wifi band RF mitigation mechanism"
+ default n
+ help
+ Wifi band RF mitigation mechanism allows multiple drivers from
+ different domains to notify the frequencies in use so that hardware
+ can be reconfigured to avoid harmonic conflicts.
+
endmenu
diff --git a/drivers/base/Makefile b/drivers/base/Makefile
index 3079bfe53d04..c844f68a6830 100644
--- a/drivers/base/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/base/Makefile
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ) += platform-msi.o
obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_ARCH_TOPOLOGY) += arch_topology.o
obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_ARCH_NUMA) += arch_numa.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI) += physical_location.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_WBRF) += wbrf.o

obj-y += test/

diff --git a/drivers/base/wbrf.c b/drivers/base/wbrf.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..2163a8ec8a9a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/base/wbrf.c
@@ -0,0 +1,227 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Wifi Band Exclusion Interface
+ * Copyright (C) 2023 Advanced Micro Devices
+ *
+ */
+
+#include <linux/wbrf.h>
+
+static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(wbrf_chain_head);
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(wbrf_mutex);
+static struct exclusion_range_pool wbrf_pool;
+
+static int _wbrf_add_exclusion_ranges(struct wbrf_ranges_in *in)
+{
+ int i, j;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(in->band_list); i++) {
+ if (!in->band_list[i].start &&
+ !in->band_list[i].end)
+ continue;
+
+ for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(wbrf_pool.band_list); j++) {
+ if (wbrf_pool.band_list[j].start == in->band_list[i].start &&
+ wbrf_pool.band_list[j].end == in->band_list[i].end) {
+ wbrf_pool.ref_counter[j]++;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ if (j < ARRAY_SIZE(wbrf_pool.band_list))
+ continue;
+
+ for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(wbrf_pool.band_list); j++) {
+ if (!wbrf_pool.band_list[j].start &&
+ !wbrf_pool.band_list[j].end) {
+ wbrf_pool.band_list[j].start = in->band_list[i].start;
+ wbrf_pool.band_list[j].end = in->band_list[i].end;
+ wbrf_pool.ref_counter[j] = 1;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ if (j >= ARRAY_SIZE(wbrf_pool.band_list))
+ return -ENOSPC;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int _wbrf_remove_exclusion_ranges(struct wbrf_ranges_in *in)
+{
+ int i, j;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(in->band_list); i++) {
+ if (!in->band_list[i].start &&
+ !in->band_list[i].end)
+ continue;
+
+ for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(wbrf_pool.band_list); j++) {
+ if (wbrf_pool.band_list[j].start == in->band_list[i].start &&
+ wbrf_pool.band_list[j].end == in->band_list[i].end) {
+ wbrf_pool.ref_counter[j]--;
+ if (!wbrf_pool.ref_counter[j]) {
+ wbrf_pool.band_list[j].start = 0;
+ wbrf_pool.band_list[j].end = 0;
+ }
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int _wbrf_retrieve_exclusion_ranges(struct wbrf_ranges_out *out)
+{
+ int out_idx = 0;
+ int i;
+
+ memset(out, 0, sizeof(*out));
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(wbrf_pool.band_list); i++) {
+ if (!wbrf_pool.band_list[i].start &&
+ !wbrf_pool.band_list[i].end)
+ continue;
+
+ out->band_list[out_idx].start = wbrf_pool.band_list[i].start;
+ out->band_list[out_idx++].end = wbrf_pool.band_list[i].end;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/**
+ * wbrf_supported_producer - Determine if the device can report frequencies
+ *
+ * @dev: device pointer
+ *
+ * WBRF is used to mitigate devices that cause harmonic interference.
+ * This function will determine if this device needs to report such frequencies.
+ */
+bool wbrf_supported_producer(struct device *dev)
+{
+ return true;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wbrf_supported_producer);
+
+/**
+ * wbrf_add_exclusion - Add frequency ranges to the exclusion list
+ *
+ * @dev: device pointer
+ * @in: input structure containing the frequency ranges to be added
+ *
+ * Add frequencies into the exclusion list for supported consumers
+ * to react to.
+ */
+int wbrf_add_exclusion(struct device *dev,
+ struct wbrf_ranges_in *in)
+{
+ int r;
+
+ mutex_lock(&wbrf_mutex);
+
+ r = _wbrf_add_exclusion_ranges(in);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&wbrf_mutex);
+ if (r)
+ return r;
+
+ blocking_notifier_call_chain(&wbrf_chain_head, WBRF_CHANGED, NULL);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wbrf_add_exclusion);
+
+/**
+ * wbrf_remove_exclusion - Remove frequency ranges from the exclusion list
+ *
+ * @dev: device pointer
+ * @in: input structure containing the frequency ranges to be removed
+ *
+ * Remove frequencies from the exclusion list for supported consumers
+ * to react to.
+ */
+int wbrf_remove_exclusion(struct device *dev,
+ struct wbrf_ranges_in *in)
+{
+ int r;
+
+ mutex_lock(&wbrf_mutex);
+
+ r = _wbrf_remove_exclusion_ranges(in);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&wbrf_mutex);
+ if (r)
+ return r;
+
+ blocking_notifier_call_chain(&wbrf_chain_head, WBRF_CHANGED, NULL);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wbrf_remove_exclusion);
+
+/**
+ * wbrf_supported_consumer - Determine if the device can react to frequencies
+ *
+ * @dev: device pointer
+ *
+ * WBRF is used to mitigate devices that cause harmonic interference.
+ * This function will determine if this device needs to react to reports from
+ * other devices for such frequencies.
+ */
+bool wbrf_supported_consumer(struct device *dev)
+{
+ return true;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wbrf_supported_consumer);
+
+/**
+ * wbrf_register_notifier - Register for notifications of frequency changes
+ *
+ * @nb: driver notifier block
+ *
+ * WBRF is used to mitigate devices that cause harmonic interference.
+ * This function will allow consumers to register for frequency notifications.
+ */
+int wbrf_register_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
+{
+ return blocking_notifier_chain_register(&wbrf_chain_head, nb);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wbrf_register_notifier);
+
+/**
+ * wbrf_unregister_notifier - Unregister for notifications of frequency changes
+ *
+ * @nb: driver notifier block
+ *
+ * WBRF is used to mitigate devices that cause harmonic interference.
+ * This function will allow consumers to unregister for frequency notifications.
+ */
+int wbrf_unregister_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
+{
+ return blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(&wbrf_chain_head, nb);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wbrf_unregister_notifier);
+
+/**
+ * wbrf_retrieve_exclusions - Retrieve the exclusion list
+ *
+ * @dev: device pointer
+ * @out: output structure containing the frequency ranges to be excluded
+ *
+ * Retrieve the current exclusion list
+ */
+int wbrf_retrieve_exclusions(struct device *dev,
+ struct wbrf_ranges_out *out)
+{
+ int r;
+
+ mutex_lock(&wbrf_mutex);
+
+ r = _wbrf_retrieve_exclusion_ranges(out);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&wbrf_mutex);
+
+ return r;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wbrf_retrieve_exclusions);
diff --git a/include/linux/wbrf.h b/include/linux/wbrf.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..32c017232874
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/wbrf.h
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/*
+ * Wifi Band Exclusion Interface
+ * Copyright (C) 2023 Advanced Micro Devices
+ */
+
+#ifndef _LINUX_WBRF_H
+#define _LINUX_WBRF_H
+
+#include <linux/device.h>
+
+/* Maximum number of wbrf ranges */
+#define MAX_NUM_OF_WBRF_RANGES 11
+
+struct exclusion_range {
+ /* start and end point of the frequency range in Hz */
+ u64 start;
+ u64 end;
+};
+
+struct exclusion_range_pool {
+ struct exclusion_range band_list[MAX_NUM_OF_WBRF_RANGES];
+ u64 ref_counter[MAX_NUM_OF_WBRF_RANGES];
+};
+
+struct wbrf_ranges_in {
+ /* valid entry: `start` and `end` filled with non-zero values */
+ struct exclusion_range band_list[MAX_NUM_OF_WBRF_RANGES];
+};
+
+struct wbrf_ranges_out {
+ u32 num_of_ranges;
+ struct exclusion_range band_list[MAX_NUM_OF_WBRF_RANGES];
+} __packed;
+
+enum wbrf_notifier_actions {
+ WBRF_CHANGED,
+};
+
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_WBRF)
+bool wbrf_supported_producer(struct device *dev);
+int wbrf_add_exclusion(struct device *adev,
+ struct wbrf_ranges_in *in);
+int wbrf_remove_exclusion(struct device *dev,
+ struct wbrf_ranges_in *in);
+int wbrf_retrieve_exclusions(struct device *dev,
+ struct wbrf_ranges_out *out);
+bool wbrf_supported_consumer(struct device *dev);
+
+int wbrf_register_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
+int wbrf_unregister_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
+#else
+static inline bool wbrf_supported_producer(struct device *dev) { return false; }
+static inline int wbrf_add_exclusion(struct device *adev,
+ struct wbrf_ranges_in *in) { return 0; }
+static inline int wbrf_remove_exclusion(struct device *dev,
+ struct wbrf_ranges_in *in) { return 0; }
+static inline int wbrf_retrieve_exclusions(struct device *dev,
+ struct wbrf_ranges_out *out)
+{
+ memset(out, 0, sizeof(*out));
+
+ return 0;
+}
+static inline bool wbrf_supported_consumer(struct device *dev) { return false; }
+static inline int wbrf_register_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb) { return 0; }
+static inline int wbrf_unregister_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb) { return 0; }
+#endif
+
+#endif /* _LINUX_WBRF_H */
--
2.34.1

2023-07-10 08:40:55

by Evan Quan

[permalink] [raw]

Subject: [PATCH V6 3/9] cfg80211: expose nl80211_chan_width_to_mhz for wide sharing

The newly added WBRF feature needs this interface for channel
width calculation.

Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <[email protected]>
---
include/net/cfg80211.h | 8 ++++++++
net/wireless/chan.c | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/net/cfg80211.h b/include/net/cfg80211.h
index 9e04f69712b1..c6dc337eafce 100644
--- a/include/net/cfg80211.h
+++ b/include/net/cfg80211.h
@@ -920,6 +920,14 @@ const struct cfg80211_chan_def *
cfg80211_chandef_compatible(const struct cfg80211_chan_def *chandef1,
const struct cfg80211_chan_def *chandef2);

+/**
+ * nl80211_chan_width_to_mhz - get the channel width in Mhz
+ * @chan_width: the channel width from &enum nl80211_chan_width
+ * Return: channel width in Mhz if the chan_width from &enum nl80211_chan_width
+ * is valid. -1 otherwise.
+ */
+int nl80211_chan_width_to_mhz(enum nl80211_chan_width chan_width);
+
/**
* cfg80211_chandef_valid - check if a channel definition is valid
* @chandef: the channel definition to check
diff --git a/net/wireless/chan.c b/net/wireless/chan.c
index 0b7e81db383d..227db04eac42 100644
--- a/net/wireless/chan.c
+++ b/net/wireless/chan.c
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ static bool cfg80211_edmg_chandef_valid(const struct cfg80211_chan_def *chandef)
return true;
}

-static int nl80211_chan_width_to_mhz(enum nl80211_chan_width chan_width)
+int nl80211_chan_width_to_mhz(enum nl80211_chan_width chan_width)
{
int mhz;

@@ -190,6 +190,7 @@ static int nl80211_chan_width_to_mhz(enum nl80211_chan_width chan_width)
}
return mhz;
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(nl80211_chan_width_to_mhz);

static int cfg80211_chandef_get_width(const struct cfg80211_chan_def *c)
{
--
2.34.1

2023-07-10 08:41:04

by Evan Quan

[permalink] [raw]

Subject: [PATCH V6 4/9] wifi: mac80211: Add support for ACPI WBRF

To support AMD's WBRF interference mitigation mechanism, Wifi adapters
utilized in the system must register the frequencies in use(or unregister
those frequencies no longer used) via the dedicated APCI calls. So that,
other drivers responding to the frequencies can take proper actions to
mitigate possible interference.

Co-developed-by: Mario Limonciello <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <[email protected]>
Co-developed-by: Evan Quan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <[email protected]>
--
v1->v2:
- place the new added member(`wbrf_supported`) in
ieee80211_local(Johannes)
- handle chandefs change scenario properly(Johannes)
- some minor fixes around code sharing and possible invalid input
checks(Johannes)
v2->v3:
- drop unnecessary input checks and intermediate APIs(Mario)
- Separate some mac80211 common code(Mario, Johannes)
v3->v4:
- some minor fixes around return values(Johannes)
---
include/linux/ieee80211.h | 1 +
net/mac80211/Makefile | 2 +
net/mac80211/chan.c | 9 ++++
net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h | 19 +++++++
net/mac80211/main.c | 2 +
net/mac80211/wbrf.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
6 files changed, 136 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 net/mac80211/wbrf.c

diff --git a/include/linux/ieee80211.h b/include/linux/ieee80211.h
index c4cf296e7eaf..0703921547f5 100644
--- a/include/linux/ieee80211.h
+++ b/include/linux/ieee80211.h
@@ -4319,6 +4319,7 @@ static inline int ieee80211_get_tdls_action(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 hdr_size)
/* convert frequencies */
#define MHZ_TO_KHZ(freq) ((freq) * 1000)
#define KHZ_TO_MHZ(freq) ((freq) / 1000)
+#define KHZ_TO_HZ(freq) ((freq) * 1000)
#define PR_KHZ(f) KHZ_TO_MHZ(f), f % 1000
#define KHZ_F "%d.%03d"

diff --git a/net/mac80211/Makefile b/net/mac80211/Makefile
index b8de44da1fb8..8f8ac567e7c8 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/Makefile
+++ b/net/mac80211/Makefile
@@ -65,4 +65,6 @@ rc80211_minstrel-$(CONFIG_MAC80211_DEBUGFS) += \

mac80211-$(CONFIG_MAC80211_RC_MINSTREL) += $(rc80211_minstrel-y)

+mac80211-$(CONFIG_WBRF) += wbrf.o
+
ccflags-y += -DDEBUG
diff --git a/net/mac80211/chan.c b/net/mac80211/chan.c
index 77c90ed8f5d7..9887471028dc 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/chan.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/chan.c
@@ -506,11 +506,16 @@ static void _ieee80211_change_chanctx(struct ieee80211_local *local,

WARN_ON(!cfg80211_chandef_compatible(&ctx->conf.def, chandef));

+ ieee80211_remove_wbrf(local, &ctx->conf.def);
+
ctx->conf.def = *chandef;

/* check if min chanctx also changed */
changed = IEEE80211_CHANCTX_CHANGE_WIDTH |
_ieee80211_recalc_chanctx_min_def(local, ctx, rsvd_for);
+
+ ieee80211_add_wbrf(local, &ctx->conf.def);
+
drv_change_chanctx(local, ctx, changed);

if (!local->use_chanctx) {
@@ -668,6 +673,8 @@ static int ieee80211_add_chanctx(struct ieee80211_local *local,
lockdep_assert_held(&local->mtx);
lockdep_assert_held(&local->chanctx_mtx);

+ ieee80211_add_wbrf(local, &ctx->conf.def);
+
if (!local->use_chanctx)
local->hw.conf.radar_enabled = ctx->conf.radar_enabled;

@@ -748,6 +755,8 @@ static void ieee80211_del_chanctx(struct ieee80211_local *local,
}

ieee80211_recalc_idle(local);
+
+ ieee80211_remove_wbrf(local, &ctx->conf.def);
}

static void ieee80211_free_chanctx(struct ieee80211_local *local,
diff --git a/net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h b/net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h
index 4159fb65038b..fb984ce7038c 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h
+++ b/net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h
@@ -1591,6 +1591,10 @@ struct ieee80211_local {

/* extended capabilities provided by mac80211 */
u8 ext_capa[8];
+
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_WBRF)
+ bool wbrf_supported;
+#endif
};

static inline struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *
@@ -2615,4 +2619,19 @@ ieee80211_eht_cap_ie_to_sta_eht_cap(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
const struct ieee80211_eht_cap_elem *eht_cap_ie_elem,
u8 eht_cap_len,
struct link_sta_info *link_sta);
+
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_WBRF)
+void ieee80211_check_wbrf_support(struct ieee80211_local *local);
+void ieee80211_add_wbrf(struct ieee80211_local *local,
+ struct cfg80211_chan_def *chandef);
+void ieee80211_remove_wbrf(struct ieee80211_local *local,
+ struct cfg80211_chan_def *chandef);
+#else
+static inline void ieee80211_check_wbrf_support(struct ieee80211_local *local) { }
+static inline void ieee80211_add_wbrf(struct ieee80211_local *local,
+ struct cfg80211_chan_def *chandef) { }
+static inline void ieee80211_remove_wbrf(struct ieee80211_local *local,
+ struct cfg80211_chan_def *chandef) { }
+#endif /* CONFIG_WBRF */
+
#endif /* IEEE80211_I_H */
diff --git a/net/mac80211/main.c b/net/mac80211/main.c
index 55cdfaef0f5d..0a55626b1546 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/main.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/main.c
@@ -1395,6 +1395,8 @@ int ieee80211_register_hw(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
debugfs_hw_add(local);
rate_control_add_debugfs(local);

+ ieee80211_check_wbrf_support(local);
+
rtnl_lock();
wiphy_lock(hw->wiphy);

diff --git a/net/mac80211/wbrf.c b/net/mac80211/wbrf.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..7ddb29d128b1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/net/mac80211/wbrf.c
@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Wifi Band Exclusion Interface for WWAN
+ * Copyright (C) 2023 Advanced Micro Devices
+ *
+ */
+
+#include <linux/wbrf.h>
+#include <net/cfg80211.h>
+#include "ieee80211_i.h"
+
+void ieee80211_check_wbrf_support(struct ieee80211_local *local)
+{
+ struct wiphy *wiphy = local->hw.wiphy;
+ struct device *dev;
+
+ if (!wiphy)
+ return;
+
+ dev = wiphy->dev.parent;
+ if (!dev)
+ return;
+
+ local->wbrf_supported = wbrf_supported_producer(dev);
+ dev_dbg(dev, "WBRF is %s supported\n",
+ local->wbrf_supported ? "" : "not");
+}
+
+static void get_chan_freq_boundary(u32 center_freq,
+ u32 bandwidth,
+ u64 *start,
+ u64 *end)
+{
+ bandwidth = MHZ_TO_KHZ(bandwidth);
+ center_freq = MHZ_TO_KHZ(center_freq);
+
+ *start = center_freq - bandwidth / 2;
+ *end = center_freq + bandwidth / 2;
+
+ /* Frequency in HZ is expected */
+ *start = KHZ_TO_HZ(*start);
+ *end = KHZ_TO_HZ(*end);
+}
+
+static void wbrf_get_ranges_from_chandef(struct cfg80211_chan_def *chandef,
+ struct wbrf_ranges_in *ranges_in)
+{
+ u64 start_freq1, end_freq1;
+ u64 start_freq2, end_freq2;
+ int bandwidth;
+
+ bandwidth = nl80211_chan_width_to_mhz(chandef->width);
+
+ get_chan_freq_boundary(chandef->center_freq1,
+ bandwidth,
+ &start_freq1,
+ &end_freq1);
+
+ ranges_in->band_list[0].start = start_freq1;
+ ranges_in->band_list[0].end = end_freq1;
+
+ if (chandef->width == NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_80P80) {
+ get_chan_freq_boundary(chandef->center_freq2,
+ bandwidth,
+ &start_freq2,
+ &end_freq2);
+
+ ranges_in->band_list[1].start = start_freq2;
+ ranges_in->band_list[1].end = end_freq2;
+ }
+}
+
+void ieee80211_add_wbrf(struct ieee80211_local *local,
+ struct cfg80211_chan_def *chandef)
+{
+ struct wbrf_ranges_in ranges_in = {0};
+ struct device *dev;
+
+ if (!local->wbrf_supported)
+ return;
+
+ dev = local->hw.wiphy->dev.parent;
+
+ wbrf_get_ranges_from_chandef(chandef, &ranges_in);
+
+ wbrf_add_exclusion(dev, &ranges_in);
+}
+
+void ieee80211_remove_wbrf(struct ieee80211_local *local,
+ struct cfg80211_chan_def *chandef)
+{
+ struct wbrf_ranges_in ranges_in = {0};
+ struct device *dev;
+
+ if (!local->wbrf_supported)
+ return;
+
+ dev = local->hw.wiphy->dev.parent;
+
+ wbrf_get_ranges_from_chandef(chandef, &ranges_in);
+
+ wbrf_remove_exclusion(dev, &ranges_in);
+}
--
2.34.1

2023-07-10 08:41:17

by Evan Quan

[permalink] [raw]

Subject: [PATCH V6 5/9] drm/amd/pm: update driver_if and ppsmc headers for coming wbrf feature

Add those data structures to support Wifi RFI mitigation feature.

Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <[email protected]>
---
.../pm/swsmu/inc/pmfw_if/smu13_driver_if_v13_0_0.h | 14 +++++++++++++-
.../pm/swsmu/inc/pmfw_if/smu13_driver_if_v13_0_7.h | 14 +++++++++++++-
.../amd/pm/swsmu/inc/pmfw_if/smu_v13_0_0_ppsmc.h | 3 ++-
.../amd/pm/swsmu/inc/pmfw_if/smu_v13_0_7_ppsmc.h | 3 ++-
4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/pmfw_if/smu13_driver_if_v13_0_0.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/pmfw_if/smu13_driver_if_v13_0_0.h
index b686fb68a6e7..d64188fb5839 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/pmfw_if/smu13_driver_if_v13_0_0.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/pmfw_if/smu13_driver_if_v13_0_0.h
@@ -388,6 +388,17 @@ typedef struct {
EccInfo_t EccInfo[24];
} EccInfoTable_t;

+typedef struct {
+ uint16_t LowFreq;
+ uint16_t HighFreq;
+} WifiOneBand_t;
+
+typedef struct {
+ uint32_t WifiBandEntryNum;
+ WifiOneBand_t WifiBandEntry[11];
+ uint32_t MmHubPadding[8];
+} WifiBandEntryTable_t;
+
//D3HOT sequences
typedef enum {
BACO_SEQUENCE,
@@ -1592,7 +1603,8 @@ typedef struct {
#define TABLE_I2C_COMMANDS 9
#define TABLE_DRIVER_INFO 10
#define TABLE_ECCINFO 11
-#define TABLE_COUNT 12
+#define TABLE_WIFIBAND 12
+#define TABLE_COUNT 13

//IH Interupt ID
#define IH_INTERRUPT_ID_TO_DRIVER 0xFE
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/pmfw_if/smu13_driver_if_v13_0_7.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/pmfw_if/smu13_driver_if_v13_0_7.h
index 4c46a0392451..77483e8485e7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/pmfw_if/smu13_driver_if_v13_0_7.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/pmfw_if/smu13_driver_if_v13_0_7.h
@@ -392,6 +392,17 @@ typedef struct {
EccInfo_t EccInfo[24];
} EccInfoTable_t;

+typedef struct {
+ uint16_t LowFreq;
+ uint16_t HighFreq;
+} WifiOneBand_t;
+
+typedef struct {
+ uint32_t WifiBandEntryNum;
+ WifiOneBand_t WifiBandEntry[11];
+ uint32_t MmHubPadding[8];
+} WifiBandEntryTable_t;
+
//D3HOT sequences
typedef enum {
BACO_SEQUENCE,
@@ -1624,7 +1635,8 @@ typedef struct {
#define TABLE_I2C_COMMANDS 9
#define TABLE_DRIVER_INFO 10
#define TABLE_ECCINFO 11
-#define TABLE_COUNT 12
+#define TABLE_WIFIBAND 12
+#define TABLE_COUNT 13

//IH Interupt ID
#define IH_INTERRUPT_ID_TO_DRIVER 0xFE
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/pmfw_if/smu_v13_0_0_ppsmc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/pmfw_if/smu_v13_0_0_ppsmc.h
index 10cff75b44d5..c98cc32d11bd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/pmfw_if/smu_v13_0_0_ppsmc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/pmfw_if/smu_v13_0_0_ppsmc.h
@@ -138,7 +138,8 @@
#define PPSMC_MSG_SetBadMemoryPagesRetiredFlagsPerChannel 0x4A
#define PPSMC_MSG_SetPriorityDeltaGain 0x4B
#define PPSMC_MSG_AllowIHHostInterrupt 0x4C
-#define PPSMC_Message_Count 0x4D
+#define PPSMC_MSG_EnableUCLKShadow 0x51
+#define PPSMC_Message_Count 0x52

//Debug Dump Message
#define DEBUGSMC_MSG_TestMessage 0x1
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/pmfw_if/smu_v13_0_7_ppsmc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/pmfw_if/smu_v13_0_7_ppsmc.h
index 6aaefca9b595..a6bf9cdd130e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/pmfw_if/smu_v13_0_7_ppsmc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/pmfw_if/smu_v13_0_7_ppsmc.h
@@ -134,6 +134,7 @@
#define PPSMC_MSG_SetBadMemoryPagesRetiredFlagsPerChannel 0x4A
#define PPSMC_MSG_SetPriorityDeltaGain 0x4B
#define PPSMC_MSG_AllowIHHostInterrupt 0x4C
-#define PPSMC_Message_Count 0x4D
+#define PPSMC_MSG_EnableUCLKShadow 0x51
+#define PPSMC_Message_Count 0x52

#endif
--
2.34.1

2023-07-10 08:41:45

by Evan Quan

[permalink] [raw]

Subject: [PATCH V6 6/9] drm/amd/pm: setup the framework to support Wifi RFI mitigation feature

With WBRF feature supported, as a driver responding to the frequencies,
amdgpu driver is able to do shadow pstate switching to mitigate possible
interference(between its (G-)DDR memory clocks and local radio module
frequency bands used by Wifi 6/6e/7).

Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <[email protected]>
--
v1->v2:
- update the prompt for feature support(Lijo)
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c | 19 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c | 194 ++++++++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/amdgpu_smu.h | 23 +++
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu_internal.h | 3 +
5 files changed, 240 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
index 02b827785e39..785d9b43f0c4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
@@ -241,6 +241,7 @@ extern int amdgpu_num_kcq;
#define AMDGPU_VCNFW_LOG_SIZE (32 * 1024)
extern int amdgpu_vcnfw_log;
extern int amdgpu_sg_display;
+extern int amdgpu_wbrf;

#define AMDGPU_VM_MAX_NUM_CTX 4096
#define AMDGPU_SG_THRESHOLD (256*1024*1024)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
index 393b6fb7a71d..d4f3921509a5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
@@ -191,6 +191,7 @@ int amdgpu_smartshift_bias;
int amdgpu_use_xgmi_p2p = 1;
int amdgpu_vcnfw_log;
int amdgpu_sg_display = -1; /* auto */
+int amdgpu_wbrf = -1;

static void amdgpu_drv_delayed_reset_work_handler(struct work_struct *work);

@@ -948,6 +949,24 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(smu_pptable_id,
"specify pptable id to be used (-1 = auto(default) value, 0 = use pptable from vbios, > 0 = soft pptable id)");
module_param_named(smu_pptable_id, amdgpu_smu_pptable_id, int, 0444);

+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_WBRF)
+/**
+ * DOC: wbrf (int)
+ * Enable Wifi RFI interference mitigation feature.
+ * Due to electrical and mechanical constraints there may be likely interference of
+ * relatively high-powered harmonics of the (G-)DDR memory clocks with local radio
+ * module frequency bands used by Wifi 6/6e/7. To mitigate the possible RFI interference,
+ * with this feature enabled, PMFW will use either “shadowed P-State” or “P-State” based
+ * on active list of frequencies in-use (to be avoided) as part of initial setting or
+ * P-state transition. However, there may be potential performance impact with this
+ * feature enabled.
+ * (0 = disabled, 1 = enabled, -1 = auto (default setting, will be enabled if supported))
+ */
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(wbrf,
+ "Enable Wifi RFI interference mitigation (0 = disabled, 1 = enabled, -1 = auto(default)");
+module_param_named(wbrf, amdgpu_wbrf, int, 0444);
+#endif
+
/* These devices are not supported by amdgpu.
* They are supported by the mach64, r128, radeon drivers
*/
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c
index 2ddf5198e5c4..83d428e890df 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c
@@ -1188,6 +1188,173 @@ static int smu_get_thermal_temperature_range(struct smu_context *smu)
return ret;
}

+/**
+ * smu_wbrf_handle_exclusion_ranges - consume the wbrf exclusion ranges
+ *
+ * @smu: smu_context pointer
+ *
+ * Retrieve the wbrf exclusion ranges and send them to PMFW for proper handling.
+ * Returns 0 on success, error on failure.
+ */
+static int smu_wbrf_handle_exclusion_ranges(struct smu_context *smu)
+{
+ struct wbrf_ranges_out wbrf_exclusion = {0};
+ struct exclusion_range *wifi_bands = wbrf_exclusion.band_list;
+ struct amdgpu_device *adev = smu->adev;
+ uint64_t start, end;
+ int ret, i, j;
+
+ ret = wbrf_retrieve_exclusions(adev->dev, &wbrf_exclusion);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(adev->dev, "Failed to retrieve exclusion ranges!\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * The exclusion ranges array we got might be filled with holes and duplicate
+ * entries. For example:
+ * {(2400, 2500), (0, 0), (6882, 6962), (2400, 2500), (0, 0), (6117, 6189), (0, 0)...}
+ * We need to do some sortups to eliminate those holes and duplicate entries.
+ * Expected output: {(2400, 2500), (6117, 6189), (6882, 6962), (0, 0)...}
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_NUM_OF_WBRF_RANGES; i++) {
+ start = wifi_bands[i].start;
+ end = wifi_bands[i].end;
+
+ /* get the last valid entry to fill the intermediate hole */
+ if (!start && !end) {
+ for (j = MAX_NUM_OF_WBRF_RANGES - 1; j > i; j--)
+ if (wifi_bands[j].start &&
+ wifi_bands[j].end)
+ break;
+
+ if (j > i) {
+ wifi_bands[i].start = wifi_bands[j].start;
+ wifi_bands[i].end = wifi_bands[j].end;
+ wifi_bands[j].start = 0;
+ wifi_bands[j].end = 0;
+ }
+
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ /* eliminate duplicate entries */
+ for (j = i + 1; j < MAX_NUM_OF_WBRF_RANGES; j++) {
+ if ((wifi_bands[j].start == start) &&
+ (wifi_bands[j].end == end)) {
+ wifi_bands[j].start = 0;
+ wifi_bands[j].end = 0;
+ continue;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* Send the sorted wifi_bands to PMFW */
+ ret = smu_set_wbrf_exclusion_ranges(smu, wifi_bands);
+ /* Give it another chance */
+ if (unlikely(ret == -EBUSY)) {
+ mdelay(5);
+ ret = smu_set_wbrf_exclusion_ranges(smu, wifi_bands);
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/**
+ * smu_wbrf_event_handler - handle notify events
+ *
+ * @nb: notifier block
+ * @action: event type
+ * @data: event data
+ *
+ * Calls relevant amdgpu function in response to wbrf event
+ * notification from kernel.
+ */
+static int smu_wbrf_event_handler(struct notifier_block *nb,
+ unsigned long action, void *_arg)
+{
+ struct smu_context *smu = container_of(nb, struct smu_context,
+ wbrf_notifier);
+
+ switch (action) {
+ case WBRF_CHANGED:
+ smu_wbrf_handle_exclusion_ranges(smu);
+ break;
+ default:
+ return NOTIFY_DONE;
+ };
+
+ return NOTIFY_OK;
+}
+
+/**
+ * smu_wbrf_support_check - check wbrf support
+ *
+ * @smu: smu_context pointer
+ *
+ * Verifies the ACPI interface whether wbrf is supported.
+ */
+static void smu_wbrf_support_check(struct smu_context *smu)
+{
+ struct amdgpu_device *adev = smu->adev;
+
+ smu->wbrf_supported = smu_is_asic_wbrf_supported(smu) &&
+ !!amdgpu_wbrf &&
+ wbrf_supported_consumer(adev->dev);
+
+ if (smu->wbrf_supported)
+ dev_info(adev->dev, "RF interference mitigation is supported\n");
+}
+
+/**
+ * smu_wbrf_init - init driver wbrf support
+ *
+ * @smu: smu_context pointer
+ *
+ * Verifies the AMD ACPI interfaces and registers with the wbrf
+ * notifier chain if wbrf feature is supported.
+ * Returns 0 on success, error on failure.
+ */
+static int smu_wbrf_init(struct smu_context *smu)
+{
+ struct amdgpu_device *adev = smu->adev;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!smu->wbrf_supported)
+ return 0;
+
+ smu->wbrf_notifier.notifier_call = smu_wbrf_event_handler;
+ ret = wbrf_register_notifier(&smu->wbrf_notifier);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ /*
+ * Some wifiband exclusion ranges may be already there
+ * before our driver loaded. To make sure our driver
+ * is awared of those exclusion ranges.
+ */
+ ret = smu_wbrf_handle_exclusion_ranges(smu);
+ if (ret)
+ dev_err(adev->dev, "Failed to handle wbrf exclusion ranges\n");
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/**
+ * smu_wbrf_fini - tear down driver wbrf support
+ *
+ * @smu: smu_context pointer
+ *
+ * Unregisters with the wbrf notifier chain.
+ */
+static void smu_wbrf_fini(struct smu_context *smu)
+{
+ if (!smu->wbrf_supported)
+ return;
+
+ wbrf_unregister_notifier(&smu->wbrf_notifier);
+}
+
static int smu_smc_hw_setup(struct smu_context *smu)
{
struct smu_feature *feature = &smu->smu_feature;
@@ -1280,6 +1447,15 @@ static int smu_smc_hw_setup(struct smu_context *smu)
if (ret)
return ret;

+ /* Enable UclkShadow on wbrf supported */
+ if (smu->wbrf_supported) {
+ ret = smu_enable_uclk_shadow(smu, true);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(adev->dev, "Failed to enable UclkShadow feature to support wbrf!\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+ }
+
/*
* With SCPM enabled, these actions(and relevant messages) are
* not needed and permitted.
@@ -1376,6 +1552,15 @@ static int smu_smc_hw_setup(struct smu_context *smu)
*/
ret = smu_set_min_dcef_deep_sleep(smu,
smu->smu_table.boot_values.dcefclk / 100);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(adev->dev, "Error setting min deepsleep dcefclk\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ /* Init wbrf support. Properly setup the notifier */
+ ret = smu_wbrf_init(smu);
+ if (ret)
+ dev_err(adev->dev, "Error during wbrf init call\n");

return ret;
}
@@ -1431,6 +1616,13 @@ static int smu_hw_init(void *handle)
return ret;
}

+ /*
+ * Check whether wbrf is supported. This needs to be done
+ * before SMU setup starts since part of SMU configuration
+ * relies on this.
+ */
+ smu_wbrf_support_check(smu);
+
if (smu->is_apu) {
ret = smu_set_gfx_imu_enable(smu);
if (ret)
@@ -1583,6 +1775,8 @@ static int smu_smc_hw_cleanup(struct smu_context *smu)
struct amdgpu_device *adev = smu->adev;
int ret = 0;

+ smu_wbrf_fini(smu);
+
cancel_work_sync(&smu->throttling_logging_work);
cancel_work_sync(&smu->interrupt_work);

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/amdgpu_smu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/amdgpu_smu.h
index 09469c750a96..5b2343cfc69b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/amdgpu_smu.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/amdgpu_smu.h
@@ -22,6 +22,8 @@
#ifndef __AMDGPU_SMU_H__
#define __AMDGPU_SMU_H__

+#include <linux/wbrf.h>
+
#include "amdgpu.h"
#include "kgd_pp_interface.h"
#include "dm_pp_interface.h"
@@ -573,6 +575,10 @@ struct smu_context
u32 debug_param_reg;
u32 debug_msg_reg;
u32 debug_resp_reg;
+
+ /* data structures for wbrf feature support */
+ bool wbrf_supported;
+ struct notifier_block wbrf_notifier;
};

struct i2c_adapter;
@@ -1354,6 +1360,23 @@ struct pptable_funcs {
* @init_pptable_microcode: Prepare the pptable microcode to upload via PSP
*/
int (*init_pptable_microcode)(struct smu_context *smu);
+
+ /**
+ * @is_asic_wbrf_supported: check whether PMFW supports the wbrf feature
+ */
+ bool (*is_asic_wbrf_supported)(struct smu_context *smu);
+
+ /**
+ * @enable_uclk_shadow: Enable the uclk shadow feature on wbrf supported
+ */
+ int (*enable_uclk_shadow)(struct smu_context *smu,
+ bool enablement);
+
+ /**
+ * @set_wbrf_exclusion_ranges: notify SMU the wifi bands occupied
+ */
+ int (*set_wbrf_exclusion_ranges)(struct smu_context *smu,
+ struct exclusion_range *exclusion_ranges);
};

typedef enum {
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu_internal.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu_internal.h
index ceb13c838067..67d7495ab49e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu_internal.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu_internal.h
@@ -97,6 +97,9 @@
#define smu_get_default_config_table_settings(smu, config_table) smu_ppt_funcs(get_default_config_table_settings, -EOPNOTSUPP, smu, config_table)
#define smu_set_config_table(smu, config_table) smu_ppt_funcs(set_config_table, -EOPNOTSUPP, smu, config_table)
#define smu_init_pptable_microcode(smu) smu_ppt_funcs(init_pptable_microcode, 0, smu)
+#define smu_is_asic_wbrf_supported(smu) smu_ppt_funcs(is_asic_wbrf_supported, false, smu)
+#define smu_enable_uclk_shadow(smu, enablement) smu_ppt_funcs(enable_uclk_shadow, 0, smu, enablement)
+#define smu_set_wbrf_exclusion_ranges(smu, exclusion_ranges) smu_ppt_funcs(set_wbrf_exclusion_ranges, -EOPNOTSUPP, smu, exclusion_ranges)

#endif
#endif
--
2.34.1

2023-07-10 08:42:03

by Evan Quan

[permalink] [raw]

Subject: [PATCH V6 7/9] drm/amd/pm: add flood detection for wbrf events

To protect PMFW from being overloaded.

Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c | 31 +++++++++++++++----
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/amdgpu_smu.h | 7 +++++
2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c
index 83d428e890df..aa7faeafc86b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c
@@ -1278,7 +1278,8 @@ static int smu_wbrf_event_handler(struct notifier_block *nb,

switch (action) {
case WBRF_CHANGED:
- smu_wbrf_handle_exclusion_ranges(smu);
+ schedule_delayed_work(&smu->wbrf_delayed_work,
+ msecs_to_jiffies(SMU_WBRF_EVENT_HANDLING_PACE));
break;
default:
return NOTIFY_DONE;
@@ -1287,6 +1288,21 @@ static int smu_wbrf_event_handler(struct notifier_block *nb,
return NOTIFY_OK;
}

+/**
+ * smu_wbrf_delayed_work_handler - callback on delayed work timer expired
+ *
+ * @work: struct work_struct pointer
+ *
+ * Flood is over and driver will consume the latest exclusion ranges.
+ */
+static void smu_wbrf_delayed_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ struct smu_context *smu =
+ container_of(work, struct smu_context, wbrf_delayed_work.work);
+
+ smu_wbrf_handle_exclusion_ranges(smu);
+}
+
/**
* smu_wbrf_support_check - check wbrf support
*
@@ -1317,12 +1333,14 @@ static void smu_wbrf_support_check(struct smu_context *smu)
*/
static int smu_wbrf_init(struct smu_context *smu)
{
- struct amdgpu_device *adev = smu->adev;
int ret;

if (!smu->wbrf_supported)
return 0;

+ INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&smu->wbrf_delayed_work,
+ smu_wbrf_delayed_work_handler);
+
smu->wbrf_notifier.notifier_call = smu_wbrf_event_handler;
ret = wbrf_register_notifier(&smu->wbrf_notifier);
if (ret)
@@ -1333,11 +1351,10 @@ static int smu_wbrf_init(struct smu_context *smu)
* before our driver loaded. To make sure our driver
* is awared of those exclusion ranges.
*/
- ret = smu_wbrf_handle_exclusion_ranges(smu);
- if (ret)
- dev_err(adev->dev, "Failed to handle wbrf exclusion ranges\n");
+ schedule_delayed_work(&smu->wbrf_delayed_work,
+ msecs_to_jiffies(SMU_WBRF_EVENT_HANDLING_PACE));

- return ret;
+ return 0;
}

/**
@@ -1353,6 +1370,8 @@ static void smu_wbrf_fini(struct smu_context *smu)
return;

wbrf_unregister_notifier(&smu->wbrf_notifier);
+
+ cancel_delayed_work_sync(&smu->wbrf_delayed_work);
}

static int smu_smc_hw_setup(struct smu_context *smu)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/amdgpu_smu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/amdgpu_smu.h
index 5b2343cfc69b..5df28d4a8c30 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/amdgpu_smu.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/amdgpu_smu.h
@@ -480,6 +480,12 @@ struct stb_context {

#define WORKLOAD_POLICY_MAX 7

+/*
+ * Configure wbrf event handling pace as there can be only one
+ * event processed every SMU_WBRF_EVENT_HANDLING_PACE ms.
+ */
+#define SMU_WBRF_EVENT_HANDLING_PACE 10
+
struct smu_context
{
struct amdgpu_device *adev;
@@ -579,6 +585,7 @@ struct smu_context
/* data structures for wbrf feature support */
bool wbrf_supported;
struct notifier_block wbrf_notifier;
+ struct delayed_work wbrf_delayed_work;
};

struct i2c_adapter;
--
2.34.1

2023-07-10 08:42:26

by Evan Quan

[permalink] [raw]

Subject: [PATCH V6 8/9] drm/amd/pm: enable Wifi RFI mitigation feature support for SMU13.0.0

Fulfill the SMU13.0.0 support for Wifi RFI mitigation feature.

Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/amdgpu_smu.h | 3 +
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/smu_types.h | 3 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/smu_v13_0.h | 3 +
.../gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu13/smu_v13_0.c | 9 +++
.../drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu13/smu_v13_0_0_ppt.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/amdgpu_smu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/amdgpu_smu.h
index 5df28d4a8c30..32764c509ba8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/amdgpu_smu.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/amdgpu_smu.h
@@ -325,6 +325,7 @@ enum smu_table_id
SMU_TABLE_PACE,
SMU_TABLE_ECCINFO,
SMU_TABLE_COMBO_PPTABLE,
+ SMU_TABLE_WIFIBAND,
SMU_TABLE_COUNT,
};

@@ -1499,6 +1500,8 @@ enum smu_baco_seq {
__dst_size); \
})

+#define HZ_IN_MHZ 1000000U
+
#if !defined(SWSMU_CODE_LAYER_L2) && !defined(SWSMU_CODE_LAYER_L3) && !defined(SWSMU_CODE_LAYER_L4)
int smu_get_power_limit(void *handle,
uint32_t *limit,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/smu_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/smu_types.h
index 297b70b9388f..5bbb60289a79 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/smu_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/smu_types.h
@@ -245,7 +245,8 @@
__SMU_DUMMY_MAP(AllowGpo), \
__SMU_DUMMY_MAP(Mode2Reset), \
__SMU_DUMMY_MAP(RequestI2cTransaction), \
- __SMU_DUMMY_MAP(GetMetricsTable),
+ __SMU_DUMMY_MAP(GetMetricsTable), \
+ __SMU_DUMMY_MAP(EnableUCLKShadow),

#undef __SMU_DUMMY_MAP
#define __SMU_DUMMY_MAP(type) SMU_MSG_##type
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/smu_v13_0.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/smu_v13_0.h
index df3baaab0037..b6fae9b92303 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/smu_v13_0.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/smu_v13_0.h
@@ -303,5 +303,8 @@ int smu_v13_0_get_pptable_from_firmware(struct smu_context *smu,
uint32_t *size,
uint32_t pptable_id);

+int smu_v13_0_enable_uclk_shadow(struct smu_context *smu,
+ bool enablement);
+
#endif
#endif
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu13/smu_v13_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu13/smu_v13_0.c
index ca379181081c..7cb24c862720 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu13/smu_v13_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu13/smu_v13_0.c
@@ -2453,3 +2453,12 @@ int smu_v13_0_mode1_reset(struct smu_context *smu)

return ret;
}
+
+int smu_v13_0_enable_uclk_shadow(struct smu_context *smu,
+ bool enablement)
+{
+ return smu_cmn_send_smc_msg_with_param(smu,
+ SMU_MSG_EnableUCLKShadow,
+ enablement,
+ NULL);
+}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu13/smu_v13_0_0_ppt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu13/smu_v13_0_0_ppt.c
index 08577d1b84ec..3e864bd2c5a4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu13/smu_v13_0_0_ppt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu13/smu_v13_0_0_ppt.c
@@ -155,6 +155,7 @@ static struct cmn2asic_msg_mapping smu_v13_0_0_message_map[SMU_MSG_MAX_COUNT] =
MSG_MAP(AllowGpo, PPSMC_MSG_SetGpoAllow, 0),
MSG_MAP(AllowIHHostInterrupt, PPSMC_MSG_AllowIHHostInterrupt, 0),
MSG_MAP(ReenableAcDcInterrupt, PPSMC_MSG_ReenableAcDcInterrupt, 0),
+ MSG_MAP(EnableUCLKShadow, PPSMC_MSG_EnableUCLKShadow, 0),
};

static struct cmn2asic_mapping smu_v13_0_0_clk_map[SMU_CLK_COUNT] = {
@@ -235,6 +236,7 @@ static struct cmn2asic_mapping smu_v13_0_0_table_map[SMU_TABLE_COUNT] = {
TAB_MAP(DRIVER_SMU_CONFIG),
TAB_MAP(ACTIVITY_MONITOR_COEFF),
[SMU_TABLE_COMBO_PPTABLE] = {1, TABLE_COMBO_PPTABLE},
+ TAB_MAP(WIFIBAND),
TAB_MAP(I2C_COMMANDS),
TAB_MAP(ECCINFO),
};
@@ -472,6 +474,9 @@ static int smu_v13_0_0_tables_init(struct smu_context *smu)
PAGE_SIZE, AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM);
SMU_TABLE_INIT(tables, SMU_TABLE_ECCINFO, sizeof(EccInfoTable_t),
PAGE_SIZE, AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM);
+ SMU_TABLE_INIT(tables, SMU_TABLE_WIFIBAND,
+ sizeof(WifiBandEntryTable_t), PAGE_SIZE,
+ AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM);

smu_table->metrics_table = kzalloc(sizeof(SmuMetricsExternal_t), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!smu_table->metrics_table)
@@ -2141,6 +2146,58 @@ static ssize_t smu_v13_0_0_get_ecc_info(struct smu_context *smu,
return ret;
}

+static bool smu_v13_0_0_wbrf_support_check(struct smu_context *smu)
+{
+ struct amdgpu_device *adev = smu->adev;
+
+ switch (adev->ip_versions[MP1_HWIP][0]) {
+ case IP_VERSION(13, 0, 0):
+ return smu->smc_fw_version >= 0x004e6300;
+ case IP_VERSION(13, 0, 10):
+ return smu->smc_fw_version >= 0x00503300;
+ default:
+ return false;
+ }
+}
+
+static int smu_v13_0_0_set_wbrf_exclusion_ranges(struct smu_context *smu,
+ struct exclusion_range *exclusion_ranges)
+{
+ WifiBandEntryTable_t wifi_bands;
+ int valid_entries = 0;
+ int ret, i;
+
+ memset(&wifi_bands, 0, sizeof(wifi_bands));
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(wifi_bands.WifiBandEntry); i++) {
+ if (!exclusion_ranges[i].start &&
+ !exclusion_ranges[i].end)
+ break;
+
+ /* PMFW expects the inputs to be in Mhz unit */
+ wifi_bands.WifiBandEntry[valid_entries].LowFreq =
+ DIV_ROUND_DOWN_ULL(exclusion_ranges[i].start, HZ_IN_MHZ);
+ wifi_bands.WifiBandEntry[valid_entries++].HighFreq =
+ DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(exclusion_ranges[i].end, HZ_IN_MHZ);
+ }
+ wifi_bands.WifiBandEntryNum = valid_entries;
+
+ /*
+ * Per confirm with PMFW team, WifiBandEntryNum = 0
+ * is a valid setting. So, there should be no direct
+ * return on that.
+ */
+
+ ret = smu_cmn_update_table(smu,
+ SMU_TABLE_WIFIBAND,
+ 0,
+ (void *)(&wifi_bands),
+ true);
+ if (ret)
+ dev_err(smu->adev->dev, "Failed to set wifiband!");
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
static const struct pptable_funcs smu_v13_0_0_ppt_funcs = {
.get_allowed_feature_mask = smu_v13_0_0_get_allowed_feature_mask,
.set_default_dpm_table = smu_v13_0_0_set_default_dpm_table,
@@ -2217,6 +2274,9 @@ static const struct pptable_funcs smu_v13_0_0_ppt_funcs = {
.send_hbm_bad_channel_flag = smu_v13_0_0_send_bad_mem_channel_flag,
.gpo_control = smu_v13_0_gpo_control,
.get_ecc_info = smu_v13_0_0_get_ecc_info,
+ .is_asic_wbrf_supported = smu_v13_0_0_wbrf_support_check,
+ .enable_uclk_shadow = smu_v13_0_enable_uclk_shadow,
+ .set_wbrf_exclusion_ranges = smu_v13_0_0_set_wbrf_exclusion_ranges,
};

void smu_v13_0_0_set_ppt_funcs(struct smu_context *smu)
--
2.34.1

2023-07-10 08:43:36

by Evan Quan

[permalink] [raw]

Subject: [PATCH V6 9/9] drm/amd/pm: enable Wifi RFI mitigation feature support for SMU13.0.7

Fulfill the SMU13.0.7 support for Wifi RFI mitigation feature.

Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <[email protected]>
---
.../drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu13/smu_v13_0_7_ppt.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 59 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu13/smu_v13_0_7_ppt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu13/smu_v13_0_7_ppt.c
index bba621615abf..4a680756208b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu13/smu_v13_0_7_ppt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu13/smu_v13_0_7_ppt.c
@@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ static struct cmn2asic_msg_mapping smu_v13_0_7_message_map[SMU_MSG_MAX_COUNT] =
MSG_MAP(AllowGpo, PPSMC_MSG_SetGpoAllow, 0),
MSG_MAP(GetPptLimit, PPSMC_MSG_GetPptLimit, 0),
MSG_MAP(NotifyPowerSource, PPSMC_MSG_NotifyPowerSource, 0),
+ MSG_MAP(EnableUCLKShadow, PPSMC_MSG_EnableUCLKShadow, 0),
};

static struct cmn2asic_mapping smu_v13_0_7_clk_map[SMU_CLK_COUNT] = {
@@ -206,6 +207,7 @@ static struct cmn2asic_mapping smu_v13_0_7_table_map[SMU_TABLE_COUNT] = {
TAB_MAP(DRIVER_SMU_CONFIG),
TAB_MAP(ACTIVITY_MONITOR_COEFF),
[SMU_TABLE_COMBO_PPTABLE] = {1, TABLE_COMBO_PPTABLE},
+ TAB_MAP(WIFIBAND),
};

static struct cmn2asic_mapping smu_v13_0_7_pwr_src_map[SMU_POWER_SOURCE_COUNT] = {
@@ -488,6 +490,9 @@ static int smu_v13_0_7_tables_init(struct smu_context *smu)
AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM);
SMU_TABLE_INIT(tables, SMU_TABLE_COMBO_PPTABLE, MP0_MP1_DATA_REGION_SIZE_COMBOPPTABLE,
PAGE_SIZE, AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM);
+ SMU_TABLE_INIT(tables, SMU_TABLE_WIFIBAND,
+ sizeof(WifiBandEntryTable_t), PAGE_SIZE,
+ AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM);

smu_table->metrics_table = kzalloc(sizeof(SmuMetricsExternal_t), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!smu_table->metrics_table)
@@ -1722,6 +1727,57 @@ static int smu_v13_0_7_set_df_cstate(struct smu_context *smu,
NULL);
}

+static bool smu_v13_0_7_wbrf_support_check(struct smu_context *smu)
+{
+ return smu->smc_fw_version > 0x00524600;
+}
+
+static int smu_v13_0_7_set_wbrf_exclusion_ranges(struct smu_context *smu,
+ struct exclusion_range *exclusion_ranges)
+{
+ WifiBandEntryTable_t wifi_bands;
+ int valid_entries = 0;
+ int ret, i;
+
+ memset(&wifi_bands, 0, sizeof(wifi_bands));
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(wifi_bands.WifiBandEntry); i++) {
+ if (!exclusion_ranges[i].start &&
+ !exclusion_ranges[i].end)
+ break;
+
+ /* PMFW expects the inputs to be in Mhz unit */
+ wifi_bands.WifiBandEntry[valid_entries].LowFreq =
+ DIV_ROUND_DOWN_ULL(exclusion_ranges[i].start, HZ_IN_MHZ);
+ wifi_bands.WifiBandEntry[valid_entries++].HighFreq =
+ DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(exclusion_ranges[i].end, HZ_IN_MHZ);
+ }
+ wifi_bands.WifiBandEntryNum = valid_entries;
+
+ /*
+ * Per confirm with PMFW team, WifiBandEntryNum = 0 is a valid setting.
+ * Considering the scenarios below:
+ * - At first the wifi device adds an exclusion range e.g. (2400,2500) to
+ * BIOS and our driver gets notified. We will set WifiBandEntryNum = 1
+ * and pass the WifiBandEntry (2400, 2500) to PMFW.
+ *
+ * - Later the wifi device removes the wifiband list added above and
+ * our driver gets notified again. At this time, driver will set
+ * WifiBandEntryNum = 0 and pass an empty WifiBandEntry list to PMFW.
+ * - PMFW may still need to do some uclk shadow update(e.g. switching
+ * from shadow clock back to primary clock) on receiving this.
+ */
+
+ ret = smu_cmn_update_table(smu,
+ SMU_TABLE_WIFIBAND,
+ 0,
+ (void *)(&wifi_bands),
+ true);
+ if (ret)
+ dev_err(smu->adev->dev, "Failed to set wifiband!");
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
static const struct pptable_funcs smu_v13_0_7_ppt_funcs = {
.get_allowed_feature_mask = smu_v13_0_7_get_allowed_feature_mask,
.set_default_dpm_table = smu_v13_0_7_set_default_dpm_table,
@@ -1787,6 +1843,9 @@ static const struct pptable_funcs smu_v13_0_7_ppt_funcs = {
.set_mp1_state = smu_v13_0_7_set_mp1_state,
.set_df_cstate = smu_v13_0_7_set_df_cstate,
.gpo_control = smu_v13_0_gpo_control,
+ .is_asic_wbrf_supported = smu_v13_0_7_wbrf_support_check,
+ .enable_uclk_shadow = smu_v13_0_enable_uclk_shadow,
+ .set_wbrf_exclusion_ranges = smu_v13_0_7_set_wbrf_exclusion_ranges,
};

void smu_v13_0_7_set_ppt_funcs(struct smu_context *smu)
--
2.34.1

2023-07-12 23:28:20

by Andrew Lunn

[permalink] [raw]

Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 1/9] drivers core: Add support for Wifi band RF mitigations

> +/**
> + * wbrf_supported_producer - Determine if the device can report frequencies
> + *
> + * @dev: device pointer
> + *
> + * WBRF is used to mitigate devices that cause harmonic interference.
> + * This function will determine if this device needs to report such frequencies.

How is the WBRF core supposed to answer this question? That it knows
there is at least one device which has registered with WBRF saying it
can change its behaviour to avoid causing interference?

Rather than "Determine if the device can report frequencies" should it be
"Determine if the device should report frequencies"

A WiFi device can always report frequencies, since it knows what
frequency is it currently using. However, it is pointless making such
reports if there is no device which can actually make use of the
information.

> +bool wbrf_supported_producer(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + return true;
> +}

I found the default implementation of true being odd. It makes me
wounder, what is the point of this call. I would expect this to see if
a linked list is empty or not.

> +/**
> + * wbrf_supported_consumer - Determine if the device can react to frequencies

This again seems odd. A device should know if it can react to
frequencies or not. WBRF core should not need to tell it. What makes
more sense to me is that this call is about a device telling the WBRF
core it is able to react to frequencies. The WBRF core then can give a
good answer to wbrf_supported_producer(), yes, i know of some other
device who might be able to do something to avoid causing interference
to you, so please do tell me about frequencies you want to use.

What is missing here in this API is policy information. The WBRF core
knows it has zero or more devices which can report what frequencies
they are using, and it has zero or more devices which maybe can do
something. But then you need policy to say this particular board needs
any registered devices to actually do something because of poor
shielding. Should this policy be as simple as a bool, or should it
actually say the board has shielding issues for a list of frequencies?
I think the answer to what will depend on the cost of taking action
when no action is actually required.

> + * wbrf_register_notifier - Register for notifications of frequency changes
> + *
> + * @nb: driver notifier block
> + *
> + * WBRF is used to mitigate devices that cause harmonic interference.
> + * This function will allow consumers to register for frequency notifications.
> + */
> +int wbrf_register_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
> +{
> + return blocking_notifier_chain_register(&wbrf_chain_head, nb);
> +}

What are the timing requirements for the handler? Should the handler
block until the device has finished doing what it needs to do and the
frequency response has settled? We don't want the WiFi device doing a
SNR measurement until we know local noise is at a minimum. I think it
would be good to document things like this here.

> +struct wbrf_ranges_out {
> + u32 num_of_ranges;
> + struct exclusion_range band_list[MAX_NUM_OF_WBRF_RANGES];
> +} __packed;

Seems odd using packed here. It is the only structure which is
packed. I would also move the u32 after the struct so it is naturally
aligned on 64 bit systems.

Andrew

2023-07-12 23:32:45

by Mario Limonciello

[permalink] [raw]

Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 1/9] drivers core: Add support for Wifi band RF mitigations

On 7/12/23 18:12, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> +/**
>> + * wbrf_supported_producer - Determine if the device can report frequencies
>> + *
>> + * @dev: device pointer
>> + *
>> + * WBRF is used to mitigate devices that cause harmonic interference.
>> + * This function will determine if this device needs to report such frequencies.
>
> How is the WBRF core supposed to answer this question? That it knows
> there is at least one device which has registered with WBRF saying it
> can change its behaviour to avoid causing interference?
>
Potential producers are supposed to be the ones asking the question.
> Rather than "Determine if the device can report frequencies" should it be
> "Determine if the device should report frequencies"
Agree.
>
> A WiFi device can always report frequencies, since it knows what
> frequency is it currently using. However, it is pointless making such
> reports if there is no device which can actually make use of the
> information.

Which is why this function exists.

With the AMD ACPI implementation the platform will dictate this information.

If a future device tree implementation is added it would work similarly.

>
>> +bool wbrf_supported_producer(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + return true;
>> +}
>
> I found the default implementation of true being odd. It makes me
> wounder, what is the point of this call. I would expect this to see if
> a linked list is empty or not.

The point is a lot clearer when you look at the description for the
Kconfig included in patch 2.

+ Ideally it is the hardware designer/provider who should provide a
+ solution for the possible RF interference issue. Since they know
+ well whether there could be RF interference issue with their
+ platforms.
+
+ Say Y to enable this generic WBRF solution for diagnosing potential
+ interference issues on systems without the ACPI mechanism and
+ developing solutions.

WBRF_AMD_ACPI and WBRF_GENERIC are mutually exclusive. I don't expect
the average user to enable WBRF_GENERIC, but there isn't anything to
stop them from doing so.

It may also aide in developing a WBRF_DEVICE_TREE or similar.

>
>> +/**
>> + * wbrf_supported_consumer - Determine if the device can react to frequencies
>
> This again seems odd. A device should know if it can react to
> frequencies or not. WBRF core should not need to tell it. What makes
> more sense to me is that this call is about a device telling the WBRF
> core it is able to react to frequencies. The WBRF core then can give a
> good answer to wbrf_supported_producer(), yes, i know of some other
> device who might be able to do something to avoid causing interference
> to you, so please do tell me about frequencies you want to use.
>
> What is missing here in this API is policy information. The WBRF core
> knows it has zero or more devices which can report what frequencies
> they are using, and it has zero or more devices which maybe can do
> something. But then you need policy to say this particular board needs
> any registered devices to actually do something because of poor
> shielding. Should this policy be as simple as a bool, or should it
> actually say the board has shielding issues for a list of frequencies?
> I think the answer to what will depend on the cost of taking action
> when no action is actually required.

Again, look at patch 2 and the purpose of WBRF_GENERIC. I suppose an
argument can be made to bring WBRF_GENERIC into patch 1.

>
>> + * wbrf_register_notifier - Register for notifications of frequency changes
>> + *
>> + * @nb: driver notifier block
>> + *
>> + * WBRF is used to mitigate devices that cause harmonic interference.
>> + * This function will allow consumers to register for frequency notifications.
>> + */
>> +int wbrf_register_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
>> +{
>> + return blocking_notifier_chain_register(&wbrf_chain_head, nb);
>> +}
>
> What are the timing requirements for the handler? Should the handler
> block until the device has finished doing what it needs to do and the
> frequency response has settled? We don't want the WiFi device doing a
> SNR measurement until we know local noise is at a minimum. I think it
> would be good to document things like this here.
>
>> +struct wbrf_ranges_out {
>> + u32 num_of_ranges;
>> + struct exclusion_range band_list[MAX_NUM_OF_WBRF_RANGES];
>> +} __packed;
>
> Seems odd using packed here. It is the only structure which is
> packed. I would also move the u32 after the struct so it is naturally
> aligned on 64 bit systems.
>
> Andrew

2023-07-18 10:56:28

by Evan Quan

[permalink] [raw]

Subject: RE: [PATCH V6 1/9] drivers core: Add support for Wifi band RF mitigations

[AMD Official Use Only - General]

Personally I would like to treat the wbrf core as a water pool. Any stream can flow in. Also any needed can drain water from it at any time.
The way to allow producers to report only when there is consumer existing does not work. Since the consumer might come after the producer.
Just considering the scenario below:
Wifi core/driver started --> wifi driver reports its frequency in-use --> proper action taken by wbrf core --> amdgpu driver(consumer) started
What should be the proper action taken by wbrf core then? Stop the producer to report its frequency in-use? That might lead consumer to never have a chance to know that.

The wbrf_supported_producer and wbrf_supported_consumer APIs seem unnecessary for the generic implementation.
But to support AMD ACPI implementation(or future device tree implementation), they are needed. The wbrf core needs to check whether the necessary AML codes are there.
It needs those information to judge whether a producer can report(will be accepted) or a consumer can retrieve needed information.

> > +struct wbrf_ranges_out {
> > + u32 num_of_ranges;
> > + struct exclusion_range band_list[MAX_NUM_OF_WBRF_RANGES];
> > +} __packed;
>
> Seems odd using packed here. It is the only structure which is
> packed. I would also move the u32 after the struct so it is naturally
> aligned on 64 bit systems.
This is to align with the AMD ACPI implementation.
But I can make this AMD ACPI specific and bring a more generic version here.

Evan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Lunn <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2023 7:12 AM
> To: Quan, Evan <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Deucher, Alexander
> <[email protected]>; Koenig, Christian
> <[email protected]>; Pan, Xinhui <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; Limonciello, Mario <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> Lazar, Lijo <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; linux-
> [email protected]; [email protected]; dri-
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 1/9] drivers core: Add support for Wifi band RF
> mitigations
>
> > +/**
> > + * wbrf_supported_producer - Determine if the device can report
> frequencies
> > + *
> > + * @dev: device pointer
> > + *
> > + * WBRF is used to mitigate devices that cause harmonic interference.
> > + * This function will determine if this device needs to report such
> frequencies.
>
> How is the WBRF core supposed to answer this question? That it knows
> there is at least one device which has registered with WBRF saying it
> can change its behaviour to avoid causing interference?
>
> Rather than "Determine if the device can report frequencies" should it be
> "Determine if the device should report frequencies"
>
> A WiFi device can always report frequencies, since it knows what
> frequency is it currently using. However, it is pointless making such
> reports if there is no device which can actually make use of the
> information.
>
> > +bool wbrf_supported_producer(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > + return true;
> > +}
>
> I found the default implementation of true being odd. It makes me
> wounder, what is the point of this call. I would expect this to see if
> a linked list is empty or not.
>
> > +/**
> > + * wbrf_supported_consumer - Determine if the device can react to
> frequencies
>
> This again seems odd. A device should know if it can react to
> frequencies or not. WBRF core should not need to tell it. What makes
> more sense to me is that this call is about a device telling the WBRF
> core it is able to react to frequencies. The WBRF core then can give a
> good answer to wbrf_supported_producer(), yes, i know of some other
> device who might be able to do something to avoid causing interference
> to you, so please do tell me about frequencies you want to use.
>
> What is missing here in this API is policy information. The WBRF core
> knows it has zero or more devices which can report what frequencies
> they are using, and it has zero or more devices which maybe can do
> something. But then you need policy to say this particular board needs
> any registered devices to actually do something because of poor
> shielding. Should this policy be as simple as a bool, or should it
> actually say the board has shielding issues for a list of frequencies?
> I think the answer to what will depend on the cost of taking action
> when no action is actually required.
>
> > + * wbrf_register_notifier - Register for notifications of frequency changes
> > + *
> > + * @nb: driver notifier block
> > + *
> > + * WBRF is used to mitigate devices that cause harmonic interference.
> > + * This function will allow consumers to register for frequency notifications.
> > + */
> > +int wbrf_register_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
> > +{
> > + return blocking_notifier_chain_register(&wbrf_chain_head, nb);
> > +}
>
> What are the timing requirements for the handler? Should the handler
> block until the device has finished doing what it needs to do and the
> frequency response has settled? We don't want the WiFi device doing a
> SNR measurement until we know local noise is at a minimum. I think it
> would be good to document things like this here.
>
> > +struct wbrf_ranges_out {
> > + u32 num_of_ranges;
> > + struct exclusion_range band_list[MAX_NUM_OF_WBRF_RANGES];
> > +} __packed;
>
> Seems odd using packed here. It is the only structure which is
> packed. I would also move the u32 after the struct so it is naturally
> aligned on 64 bit systems.
>
> Andrew

2023-07-18 14:29:43

by Andrew Lunn

[permalink] [raw]

Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 1/9] drivers core: Add support for Wifi band RF mitigations

> The wbrf_supported_producer and wbrf_supported_consumer APIs seem
> unnecessary for the generic implementation.

I'm happy with these, once the description is corrected. As i said in
another comment, 'can' should be replaced with 'should'. The device
itself knows if it can, only the core knows if it should, based on the
policy of if actions need to be taken, and there are both providers
and consumers registered with the core.

Andrew

2023-07-19 02:39:22

by Evan Quan

[permalink] [raw]

Subject: RE: [PATCH V6 1/9] drivers core: Add support for Wifi band RF mitigations

[AMD Official Use Only - General]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Lunn <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2023 10:16 PM
> To: Quan, Evan <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Deucher, Alexander
> <[email protected]>; Koenig, Christian
> <[email protected]>; Pan, Xinhui <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; Limonciello, Mario <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> Lazar, Lijo <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; linux-
> [email protected]; [email protected]; dri-
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 1/9] drivers core: Add support for Wifi band RF
> mitigations
>
> > The wbrf_supported_producer and wbrf_supported_consumer APIs seem
> > unnecessary for the generic implementation.
>
> I'm happy with these, once the description is corrected. As i said in another
> comment, 'can' should be replaced with 'should'. The device itself knows if it
> can, only the core knows if it should, based on the policy of if actions need to
> be taken, and there are both providers and consumers registered with the
> core.
Sure, will update that in V7.

Evan
>
> Andrew