This patch allows skbs to be released from the RX reorder buffer in
case they have been there for an unexpectedly long time without us
having received the missing frames before them. Previously, these
frames were only released when the reorder window moved and that could
take very long time unless new frames were received constantly (e.g.,
TCP connections could be killed more or less indefinitely).
This situation should not happen very frequently, but it looks like
there are some scenarious that trigger for some reason. As such, this
should be considered mostly a workaround to speed up recovery from
unexpected siutation that could result in connections hanging for long
periods of time.
The changes here will only check for timeout situation when adding new
RX frames to the reorder buffer. It does not handle all possible
cases, but seems to help for most cases that could result from common
network usage (e.g., TCP retrying at least couple of times). For more
completely coverage, a timer could be used to periodically check
whether there are any frames remaining in the reorder buffer if no new
frames are received.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <[email protected]>
---
net/mac80211/agg-rx.c | 8 +++
net/mac80211/rx.c | 107 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
net/mac80211/sta_info.h | 2
3 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
--- wireless-testing.orig/net/mac80211/agg-rx.c 2009-04-29 18:38:29.000000000 +0300
+++ wireless-testing/net/mac80211/agg-rx.c 2009-04-29 18:40:42.000000000 +0300
@@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ void __ieee80211_stop_rx_ba_session(stru
spin_lock_bh(&sta->lock);
/* free resources */
kfree(sta->ampdu_mlme.tid_rx[tid]->reorder_buf);
+ kfree(sta->ampdu_mlme.tid_rx[tid]->reorder_time);
if (!sta->ampdu_mlme.tid_rx[tid]->shutdown) {
kfree(sta->ampdu_mlme.tid_rx[tid]);
@@ -268,13 +269,18 @@ void ieee80211_process_addba_request(str
/* prepare reordering buffer */
tid_agg_rx->reorder_buf =
kcalloc(buf_size, sizeof(struct sk_buff *), GFP_ATOMIC);
- if (!tid_agg_rx->reorder_buf) {
+ tid_agg_rx->reorder_time =
+ kcalloc(buf_size, sizeof(unsigned long), GFP_ATOMIC);
+ if (!tid_agg_rx->reorder_buf || !tid_agg_rx->reorder_time) {
#ifdef CONFIG_MAC80211_HT_DEBUG
if (net_ratelimit())
printk(KERN_ERR "can not allocate reordering buffer "
"to tid %d\n", tid);
#endif
+ kfree(tid_agg_rx->reorder_buf);
+ kfree(tid_agg_rx->reorder_time);
kfree(sta->ampdu_mlme.tid_rx[tid]);
+ sta->ampdu_mlme.tid_rx[tid] = NULL;
goto end;
}
--- wireless-testing.orig/net/mac80211/rx.c 2009-04-29 18:38:26.000000000 +0300
+++ wireless-testing/net/mac80211/rx.c 2009-04-30 12:30:11.000000000 +0300
@@ -2284,6 +2284,34 @@ static inline u16 seq_sub(u16 sq1, u16 s
}
+static void ieee80211_release_reorder_frame(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
+ struct tid_ampdu_rx *tid_agg_rx,
+ int index)
+{
+ struct ieee80211_supported_band *sband;
+ struct ieee80211_rate *rate;
+ struct ieee80211_rx_status status;
+
+ if (!tid_agg_rx->reorder_buf[index])
+ goto no_frame;
+
+ /* release the reordered frames to stack */
+ memcpy(&status, tid_agg_rx->reorder_buf[index]->cb, sizeof(status));
+ sband = hw->wiphy->bands[status.band];
+ if (status.flag & RX_FLAG_HT)
+ rate = sband->bitrates; /* TODO: HT rates */
+ else
+ rate = &sband->bitrates[status.rate_idx];
+ __ieee80211_rx_handle_packet(hw, tid_agg_rx->reorder_buf[index],
+ &status, rate);
+ tid_agg_rx->stored_mpdu_num--;
+ tid_agg_rx->reorder_buf[index] = NULL;
+
+no_frame:
+ tid_agg_rx->head_seq_num = seq_inc(tid_agg_rx->head_seq_num);
+}
+
+
/*
* As it function blongs to Rx path it must be called with
* the proper rcu_read_lock protection for its flow.
@@ -2295,12 +2323,8 @@ static u8 ieee80211_sta_manage_reorder_b
u16 mpdu_seq_num,
int bar_req)
{
- struct ieee80211_local *local = hw_to_local(hw);
- struct ieee80211_rx_status status;
u16 head_seq_num, buf_size;
int index;
- struct ieee80211_supported_band *sband;
- struct ieee80211_rate *rate;
buf_size = tid_agg_rx->buf_size;
head_seq_num = tid_agg_rx->head_seq_num;
@@ -2325,28 +2349,8 @@ static u8 ieee80211_sta_manage_reorder_b
index = seq_sub(tid_agg_rx->head_seq_num,
tid_agg_rx->ssn)
% tid_agg_rx->buf_size;
-
- if (tid_agg_rx->reorder_buf[index]) {
- /* release the reordered frames to stack */
- memcpy(&status,
- tid_agg_rx->reorder_buf[index]->cb,
- sizeof(status));
- sband = local->hw.wiphy->bands[status.band];
- if (status.flag & RX_FLAG_HT) {
- /* TODO: HT rates */
- rate = sband->bitrates;
- } else {
- rate = &sband->bitrates
- [status.rate_idx];
- }
- __ieee80211_rx_handle_packet(hw,
- tid_agg_rx->reorder_buf[index],
- &status, rate);
- tid_agg_rx->stored_mpdu_num--;
- tid_agg_rx->reorder_buf[index] = NULL;
- }
- tid_agg_rx->head_seq_num =
- seq_inc(tid_agg_rx->head_seq_num);
+ ieee80211_release_reorder_frame(hw, tid_agg_rx,
+ index);
}
if (bar_req)
return 1;
@@ -2373,26 +2377,49 @@ static u8 ieee80211_sta_manage_reorder_b
/* put the frame in the reordering buffer */
tid_agg_rx->reorder_buf[index] = skb;
+ tid_agg_rx->reorder_time[index] = jiffies;
memcpy(tid_agg_rx->reorder_buf[index]->cb, rxstatus,
sizeof(*rxstatus));
tid_agg_rx->stored_mpdu_num++;
/* release the buffer until next missing frame */
index = seq_sub(tid_agg_rx->head_seq_num, tid_agg_rx->ssn)
% tid_agg_rx->buf_size;
- while (tid_agg_rx->reorder_buf[index]) {
- /* release the reordered frame back to stack */
- memcpy(&status, tid_agg_rx->reorder_buf[index]->cb,
- sizeof(status));
- sband = local->hw.wiphy->bands[status.band];
- if (status.flag & RX_FLAG_HT)
- rate = sband->bitrates; /* TODO: HT rates */
- else
- rate = &sband->bitrates[status.rate_idx];
- __ieee80211_rx_handle_packet(hw, tid_agg_rx->reorder_buf[index],
- &status, rate);
- tid_agg_rx->stored_mpdu_num--;
- tid_agg_rx->reorder_buf[index] = NULL;
- tid_agg_rx->head_seq_num = seq_inc(tid_agg_rx->head_seq_num);
+ if (!tid_agg_rx->reorder_buf[index] &&
+ tid_agg_rx->stored_mpdu_num > 1) {
+ /*
+ * No buffers ready to be released, but check whether any
+ * frames in the reorder buffer have timed out.
+ */
+ int j;
+ int skipped = 1;
+ for (j = (index + 1) % tid_agg_rx->buf_size; j != index;
+ j = (j + 1) % tid_agg_rx->buf_size) {
+ if (tid_agg_rx->reorder_buf[j] == NULL) {
+ skipped++;
+ continue;
+ }
+ if (!time_after(jiffies, tid_agg_rx->reorder_time[j] +
+ HZ / 10))
+ break;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_MAC80211_HT_DEBUG
+ if (net_ratelimit())
+ printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: release timed "
+ "out RX reorder frame\n",
+ wiphy_name(hw->wiphy));
+#endif
+ ieee80211_release_reorder_frame(hw, tid_agg_rx, j);
+
+ /*
+ * Increment the head seq# also for the skipped slots.
+ */
+ tid_agg_rx->head_seq_num =
+ (tid_agg_rx->head_seq_num + skipped) &
+ SEQ_MASK;
+ skipped = 0;
+ }
+ } else while (tid_agg_rx->reorder_buf[index]) {
+ ieee80211_release_reorder_frame(hw, tid_agg_rx, index);
index = seq_sub(tid_agg_rx->head_seq_num,
tid_agg_rx->ssn) % tid_agg_rx->buf_size;
}
--- wireless-testing.orig/net/mac80211/sta_info.h 2009-04-29 18:37:26.000000000 +0300
+++ wireless-testing/net/mac80211/sta_info.h 2009-04-29 18:38:06.000000000 +0300
@@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ struct tid_ampdu_tx {
* struct tid_ampdu_rx - TID aggregation information (Rx).
*
* @reorder_buf: buffer to reorder incoming aggregated MPDUs
+ * @reorder_time: jiffies when skb was added
* @session_timer: check if peer keeps Tx-ing on the TID (by timeout value)
* @head_seq_num: head sequence number in reordering buffer.
* @stored_mpdu_num: number of MPDUs in reordering buffer
@@ -99,6 +100,7 @@ struct tid_ampdu_tx {
*/
struct tid_ampdu_rx {
struct sk_buff **reorder_buf;
+ unsigned long *reorder_time;
struct timer_list session_timer;
u16 head_seq_num;
u16 stored_mpdu_num;
--
Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 04:50:32PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> Been testing this for a while and it helps. How about splitting the
> add of ieee80211_release_reorder_frame() as a helper into a separate
> patch to make the work around clearer smaller and clearer?
Sure. I now have that and the #define for timeout value ready to go. I'm
hoping to run some more tests on these and various other things related
to the RX reorder buffer and then submit the patches.
--
Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 2:41 AM, Jouni Malinen <[email protected]> wrote:
> This patch allows skbs to be released from the RX reorder buffer in
> case they have been there for an unexpectedly long time without us
> having received the missing frames before them. Previously, these
> frames were only released when the reorder window moved and that could
> take very long time unless new frames were received constantly (e.g.,
> TCP connections could be killed more or less indefinitely).
>
> This situation should not happen very frequently, but it looks like
> there are some scenarious that trigger for some reason. As such, this
> should be considered mostly a workaround to speed up recovery from
> unexpected siutation that could result in connections hanging for long
> periods of time.
>
> The changes here will only check for timeout situation when adding new
> RX frames to the reorder buffer. It does not handle all possible
> cases, but seems to help for most cases that could result from common
> network usage (e.g., TCP retrying at least couple of times). For more
> completely coverage, a timer could be used to periodically check
> whether there are any frames remaining in the reorder buffer if no new
> frames are received.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <[email protected]>
Been testing this for a while and it helps. How about splitting the
add of ieee80211_release_reorder_frame() as a helper into a separate
patch to make the work around clearer smaller and clearer?
Luis