> > ?> can a find a fix
> > ?> for both of them
> >
> > I am building kernel with pos<0 check added...
>
> thanks! if it does not works, i have only one more idea(a patch
> which removes some suspicious code which abuses a pointer any way that
> has to be fixed properly ). otherwise i need to recreate the issue and
> capture the stack trace completely, put debug prints. i ran an
> overnight test but was unable to recreate the issue. later today AN i
> got a crash accidentally but only once, after that never.
What is a complete stack trace? Maybe I can configure console in some way and
get the needed information.
2012/1/6 MR <[email protected]>:
> ?> > ?> can a find a fix
> ?> > ?> for both of them
> ?> >
> ?> > I am building kernel with pos<0 check added...
> ?>
> ?> thanks! ?if it does not works, i have only one more idea(a patch
> ?> which removes some suspicious code which abuses a pointer any way that
> ?> has to be fixed properly ). otherwise i need to recreate the issue and
> ?> capture the stack trace completely, put debug prints. i ran an
> ?> overnight test but was unable to recreate the issue. later today AN ?i
> ?> got a crash accidentally but only once, after that never.
>
> What is a complete stack trace? Maybe I can configure console in some way and
> get the needed information.
just want to make sure , if we get the EIP and the exact line.
ath9k_config+0x115/0x780 points to ath_update_survey_stats
>
>
--
shafi