Return-path: Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.21]:37215 "EHLO orsmga101.jf.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030381AbXBOSDd (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:03:33 -0500 Message-ID: <45D48BDE.4070708@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 08:35:42 -0800 From: James Ketrenos MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Buesch CC: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Zhu Yi Subject: Re: IPW2200 monitoring FW broken References: <200702151840.16963.mb@bu3sch.de> In-Reply-To: <200702151840.16963.mb@bu3sch.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Michael Buesch wrote: > Is IPW2200 monitoring FW still broken? > I miss huge amounts of packets when I try to monitor > some traffic. > > I'm using current wireless-2.6 + v3.0 firmware. > > Using two antennas. > What type of frames? Data or management & control? If you use wireshark to capture, you can't update the packet capture window or you'll lose packets; but you should be able to get them all if you're doing a tethereal > somefile or if you turn off the update of the main window. I'm not sure if it can capture control frames or not. I seem to recall it getting some ACK frames but I don't think it was passing up all of them, or if it ever passed up the CTS frames. But you should be getting the bulk of the data frames. Yi -- do you recall what the ipw2200 firmware would pass up? James