Return-path: Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]:43675 "EHLO fencepost.gnu.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965676AbXBGIRe (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Feb 2007 03:17:34 -0500 Received: from proski by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HEhyZ-0000Sy-RF for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2007 03:16:23 -0500 Subject: Re: RFT bcm43xx: Really _GOOD_ news From: Pavel Roskin To: Gene Heskett Cc: bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de, wireless In-Reply-To: <200702070303.40968.gene.heskett@verizon.net> References: <45C8E64B.1050605@lwfinger.net> <200702061848.00815.gene.heskett@verizon.net> <45C95830.6040507@lwfinger.net> <200702070303.40968.gene.heskett@verizon.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 03:17:30 -0500 Message-Id: <1170836250.11150.116.camel@dv> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 03:03 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > And the 4318 is whats in my lappy. What does it break? Oh, please, let's stop such questions. Does it really matter what some knowingly wrong change does to particular hardware? Just don't try the old patch. Just forget that it existed. It's not going to the kernel. Please try the new patch. Ideally, measure speeds for various rates, because it's the speed that the patch is supposed to improve. If you have more questions of this kind, please make sure my personal e-mail is not in CC. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin