Message-ID: <45CCBB93.2040703@lwfinger.net>
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 12:21:07 -0600
From: Larry Finger <larry.finger@lwfinger.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
CC: Joseph Jezak <josejx@gentoo.org>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	John Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx: Fix code for spec changes of 2/7/2007
References: <45cca236.+lL/rsW3DbM3elnk%Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> <200702091811.40683.mb@bu3sch.de> <45CCF432.2070002@gentoo.org> <200702091829.51002.mb@bu3sch.de>
In-Reply-To: <200702091829.51002.mb@bu3sch.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org

Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Friday 09 February 2007 23:22, Joseph Jezak wrote:
>>> Well, I don't review the rest until you say to which specs you did the changes. ;)
>> http://bcm-specs.sipsolutions.net/B5PHY
>>
>> Larry was working from the old specs, so when I updated it, I only 
>> updated the old specs.  I'll fix the v4 specs soon.
> 
> Ah, ok. I think we should decide on which specs carry most recent information.
> I think v3 specs should be considered obsolete and new information/ fixes
> should go into v4. It is already too confusing where to find newest information
> to a certain thing.
> 

I'll agree to that as long as there is a clear indication of any differences between V3 and V4 firmware.

Larry