Return-path: Received: from styx.suse.cz ([82.119.242.94]:59155 "EHLO mail.suse.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750704AbXB0K2L (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Feb 2007 05:28:11 -0500 Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 11:28:08 +0100 From: Jiri Benc To: "John W. Linville" Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] wireless: rename d80211 -> mac80211 Message-ID: <20070227112808.2fc32c6a@logostar.upir.cz> In-Reply-To: <20070227032756.GA6569@tuxdriver.com> References: <20070227032756.GA6569@tuxdriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 22:27:57 -0500, John W. Linville wrote: > I apologize if this seems sudden, but I don't really think doing > it with a lot of warning would have been any better. So, I made > the decision and did it. Please don't complain unless it is just > unbearable for you. :-) I think it's indeed a good time for such change now. Thanks for doing that! When we are at it, I think the module name should be 'mac80211.ko' and not '80211.ko'. This means renaming of mac80211.c (I suggest mac80211_proto.c or mac80211_main.c). Does it sounds reasonable? Should I make a patch? Thanks, Jiri -- Jiri Benc SUSE Labs