Return-path: Received: from mtiwmhc12.worldnet.att.net ([204.127.131.116]:53520 "EHLO mtiwmhc12.worldnet.att.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161329AbXBGPmN (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Feb 2007 10:42:13 -0500 Message-ID: <45C9F352.3030706@lwfinger.net> Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 09:42:10 -0600 From: Larry Finger MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Gryniewicz CC: Pavel Roskin , wireless , bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de Subject: Re: RFT bcm43xx: Really _GOOD_ news References: <45C8E64B.1050605@lwfinger.net> <200702061848.00815.gene.heskett@verizon.net> <45C95830.6040507@lwfinger.net> <200702070303.40968.gene.heskett@verizon.net> <1170836250.11150.116.camel@dv> <1170861665.6964.4.camel@athena.fprintf.net> In-Reply-To: <1170861665.6964.4.camel@athena.fprintf.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: > On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 03:17 -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote: >> On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 03:03 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: >> >>> And the 4318 is whats in my lappy. What does it break? >> Oh, please, let's stop such questions. Does it really matter what some >> knowingly wrong change does to particular hardware? Just don't try the >> old patch. Just forget that it existed. It's not going to the kernel. >> >> Please try the new patch. Ideally, measure speeds for various rates, >> because it's the speed that the patch is supposed to improve. >> >> If you have more questions of this kind, please make sure my personal >> e-mail is not in CC. >>esg > > Except that the new patch changes nothing for us poor 4318 users, so > what's the point of trying it? > > That said, I'm running the broken patch right now, and my 4318 is > working better than ever before, so it changed *something* for my card. Intriguing. Please send me the output of 'dmesg | grep bcm43xx'. Thanks. Larry