Return-path: Received: from ra.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.52]:3917 "EHLO ra.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932359AbXB1TGj (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:06:39 -0500 Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 13:35:35 -0500 From: "John W. Linville" To: Jouni Malinen Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" , Jiri Benc , Stephen Hemminger , Larry Finger , Pavel Roskin , Alex Davis , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Patch to allow specification of interface name prefix Message-ID: <20070228183535.GB5353@tuxdriver.com> References: <510326.55988.qm@web50211.mail.yahoo.com> <20070224233001.3ok4k0c00ksos4sw@webmail.spamcop.net> <45E112F7.9090908@lwfinger.net> <20070226150241.1b5b63b2@freekitty> <20070227111644.784600be@logostar.upir.cz> <43e72e890702271055sc1525ecy54870626125a7fae@mail.gmail.com> <20070228012500.GB4072@tuxdriver.com> <20070228164437.GA31074@devicescape.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20070228164437.GA31074@devicescape.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 08:44:37AM -0800, Jouni Malinen wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 08:25:00PM -0500, John W. Linville wrote: > > > Hopefully wmaster will fall off the user's radar soon. Regarding the > > current wlanX interfaces, most modes will be using ethernet framing, > > so maybe ethX is fine. > > Why would we need to change anything now? What's wrong with wlan#? See the earlier parts of the thread... :-) -- John W. Linville linville@tuxdriver.com