Return-path: Received: from static-ip-62-75-166-246.inaddr.intergenia.de ([62.75.166.246]:60156 "EHLO vs166246.vserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423238AbXBITRl (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Feb 2007 14:17:41 -0500 From: Michael Buesch To: Joseph Jezak Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx: Fix code for spec changes of 2/7/2007 Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 20:17:36 +0100 Cc: Larry Finger , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, John Linville , Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de References: <45cca236.+lL/rsW3DbM3elnk%Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> <45CCBB93.2040703@lwfinger.net> <45CCC5DF.8010001@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <45CCC5DF.8010001@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200702092017.36950.mb@bu3sch.de> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Friday 09 February 2007 20:05, Joseph Jezak wrote: > > I'll agree to that as long as there is a clear indication of any differences between V3 and V4 firmware. > > That's also part of the problem. With the v4 driver, Broadcom > dropped support for a number of older BPHY devices (4301/4303 and > some 4306 revisions). Do we still want to support those? Should I > continue writing the specs for the uCode revision it's based on or > should I combine them? If it's easily possible, please try to combine the old stuff with the new v4 specs. I think it's basically only dropped if() branches, right? -- Greetings Michael.