Return-path: Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.186]:63880 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752349AbXB1Qwl (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:52:41 -0500 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id o25so610549nfa for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 08:52:40 -0800 (PST) To: Johannes Berg Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/28] rt2x00: Add debugfs support Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:52:36 +0100 Cc: "John W. Linville" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org References: <200702281507.13953.IvDoorn@gmail.com> <200702281732.08221.IvDoorn@gmail.com> <1172680639.5015.39.camel@johannes.berg> In-Reply-To: <1172680639.5015.39.camel@johannes.berg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200702281752.36875.IvDoorn@gmail.com> From: Ivo van Doorn Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > > Well at the moment the cfg80211/nl80211 updates have had a great impact > > on our CVS tree. So it is starting to look like we are going to drop our CVS > > version if we don't find a backwards compatibility for vanilla kernels for it. > > Well, we had to start looking forward somewhere. I wish we'd gotten our > cfg80211 wext-compat hooks into mainline but unfortunately that isn't > so. True, and I was expecting problems like this when I decided to keep supporting vanilla kernels. But at the moment i am just considering what the best options for rt2x00 would be. > > Working the other way around will have a negative (But as mentioned above > > a probably unescapable) side effect. 90% of our testers use the CVS against > > vanilla kernels, and I cannot see them swicthing to the wireless-dev tree. > > So I could switch (it is already under consideration) but it will cost us a lot > > of testers.. :( > > Intel is providing snapshots for this stuff and I think James is still > trying to figure out if there's any chance to provide cfg80211 w/o > patches to mainline, which may just work until critical functionality > mac80211 is moved over to cfg80211 instead of wext. I have seen that package, James is as far with backwards compatibility as we are in rt2x00. But we are apparently hitting against the same problem. But there is some progress I believe, Robin seems to have managed to compile cfg80211 now against a 2.6.20 kernel. So we probably need some research now to add older kernels to the supported list. ;) Ivo