Return-path: Received: from ra.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.52]:2836 "EHLO ra.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161233AbXBUNvk (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:51:40 -0500 Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:32:03 -0500 From: "John W. Linville" To: Johannes Berg Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, jbenc@suse.cz Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] d80211: fix build break from netdev class_device -> device changes Message-ID: <20070221133202.GB4978@tuxdriver.com> References: <20070221005811.GA3875@tuxdriver.com> <1172054717.3705.1.camel@johannes.berg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1172054717.3705.1.camel@johannes.berg> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 11:45:16AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 19:58 -0500, John W. Linville wrote: > > In preparation for 2.6.21-rc1, I pulled Linus' latest tree into a > > branch of wireless-dev. I hit a build problem with the sysfs stuff, > > due to the recent changes from class_device -> device for net_device. > > Hmm, need to look up the reason and see if wiphy stuff should follow. Exactly what I was thinking, and what made me question the patch's completeness... > > Since I don't count sysfs as a strength, I thought it was worth > > posting this for some review before I actually pulled Linus' latest > > into wireless-dev and slapped this on top of it... :-) > > > > Comments? > > Seems fine. Is to_net_dev() defined in netdevice.h now? Ja. > OTOH, we might want to take this opportunity and move it all to > debugfs ;) Excellent suggestion. But for now, I just want my tree to build and run... :-) Thanks for the eyeballs! John -- John W. Linville linville@tuxdriver.com