Return-path: Received: from static-ip-62-75-166-246.inaddr.intergenia.de ([62.75.166.246]:41516 "EHLO vs166246.vserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753413AbXCWU2O (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Mar 2007 16:28:14 -0400 From: Michael Buesch To: jt@hpl.hp.com Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH] fix information leak in wireless extensions on 64-bit platforms Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 21:27:17 +0100 Cc: Chris Wright , Johannes Berg , linux-wireless , "John W. Linville" , stable@kernel.org References: <1174640787.3588.65.camel@johannes.berg> <20070323193643.GY10574@sequoia.sous-sol.org> <20070323200037.GA5165@bougret.hpl.hp.com> In-Reply-To: <20070323200037.GA5165@bougret.hpl.hp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200703232127.17790.mb@bu3sch.de> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Friday 23 March 2007 21:00, Jean Tourrilhes wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 12:36:43PM -0700, Chris Wright wrote: > > * Jean Tourrilhes (jt@hpl.hp.com) wrote: > > > > > The last thing is that I could not test those stuff myself, > > > and the testing done for me was limited. I would be more confident if > > > you were to give it a good beating before we push that into stable, > > > because you know what to test. > > > > That's useful info. Have you had any luck (it looks pretty straight > > forward)? > > Let's be more clear. I tested properly on 32 bits. But, 32 > bits is not where there is issue, this issue is specific to 64 bits. I > don't have a 64 bits platfor. It seems that few people doing wireless > have access to 64 bits platform (actually, it seems most of them don't > have access to SMP either), otherwise this would have been found many > years ago. > Johannes is one of the few having access to 64 bits stuff. I finally have an USB ZD stick now, too. So I can test stuff, too. Should I test this somehow? -- Greetings Michael.