Subject: Re: [patch 2/5] Add basic support for IEEE 802.11n discovery and  association
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Tomas Winkler <tomasw@gmail.com>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@gmail.com>,
	mohamed <mabbas@linux.intel.com>, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	linville@tuxdriver.com
In-Reply-To: <1ba2fa240703300418r781931cdp50430dcb02259f1@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1174909105.1364.53.camel@dell-4965.jf.intel.com>
	 <1175112213.5151.133.camel@johannes.berg>
	 <43e72e890703291246p1010770es9d8a81979d03fa72@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1ba2fa240703291648h6b0d10bdje2ea54f3c1754f5b@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1175251112.19085.4.camel@johannes.berg>
	 <1ba2fa240703300418r781931cdp50430dcb02259f1@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-M/9zhO7YrnlzAKlKk5Ab"
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 14:11:24 +0200
Message-Id: <1175256684.19085.22.camel@johannes.berg>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org


--=-M/9zhO7YrnlzAKlKk5Ab
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Text email is great. But the useless attachment isn't.

>=20
> Anyhow I still would like to repeat my question unrelated to the
> discussion above since I don't see IE structs defined in headers
> unlike the old wireless stack. (net/ieee80211.h)

I don't understand you. What's wrong with linux/ieee80211.h and
Mohamed's patch 1/5?

johannes


--=-M/9zhO7YrnlzAKlKk5Ab
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook)

iD8DBQBGDP5s/ETPhpq3jKURAjTKAKCAXJfY8ur5aP5hbATza9RytSsdawCeLJaT
1FBUycXcXQuPIA6GcSp7GXg=
=xdya
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-M/9zhO7YrnlzAKlKk5Ab--