Return-path: Received: from static-ip-62-75-166-246.inaddr.intergenia.de ([62.75.166.246]:53218 "EHLO vs166246.vserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752914AbXCLUyh (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Mar 2007 16:54:37 -0400 From: Michael Buesch To: Larry Finger Subject: Re: [RFT] [PATCH] bcm43xx: ACI fixes Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 21:53:34 +0100 Cc: Stefano Brivio , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de References: <20070312010420.353a59c0@localhost> <20070312070558.07488359@localhost> <45F5B805.8040401@lwfinger.net> In-Reply-To: <45F5B805.8040401@lwfinger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200703122153.34684.mb@bu3sch.de> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Monday 12 March 2007 21:28, Larry Finger wrote: > Stefano Brivio wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 00:51:19 -0500 > > > > Well, wait. I'd want to see some performance improvements before the patch > > is applied. That's why I didn't send it to John and put RFT in the > > subject. Are there any? > > No, I don't see any significant difference in RX or TX throughput with this patch. So far, I have > only tested on the 4311. Results for the 4306 and 4318 will come later. Not that interference mitigation can not improve the signal, if there is no interference disturbing it. ;) It _is_ already best possible signal, then. -- Greetings Michael.