Return-path: Received: from cvs.openbsd.org ([199.185.137.3]:6297 "EHLO cvs.openbsd.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1767238AbXDETQJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Apr 2007 15:16:09 -0400 Message-Id: <200704051913.l35JD3xp017333@cvs.openbsd.org> To: Michael Buesch cc: Joseph Jezak , Stefano Brivio , Marcus Glocker , Jon Simola , Theo de Raadt , Martin Langer , Danny van Dyk , Andreas Jaggi , Larry Finger , Quaker.Fang@sun.com, Johannes Berg , John Linville , Greg kh , bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, license-violation@gpl-violations.org Subject: Re: OpenBSD bcw: Possible GPL license violation issues In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 05 Apr 2007 21:09:00 +0200." <200704052109.00797.mb@bu3sch.de> Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 13:13:03 -0600 From: Theo de Raadt Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > I won't reply to your mail anymore, as you are not interrested > in a real solution to this. Instead you write things like that: > > On Thursday 05 April 2007 20:48, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > You are a very poor example of humankind. > > Which has absolutely nothing to do with the issue of > copyright and GPL violation. You're right. This whole thing has absolutely nothing to do with the GPL. The entire issue has to do with your approach towards solving problems. An approach which has shown that it just plain does not get the results that you, we, or anyone in the community benefits from. > I could say similiar things to you, but I don't. > I wrote the initial mail to get the issue resolved, but > not insult you. You wrote the initial mail in PUBLIC rather than in PRIVATE, and you did not get the result you wanted. > Yet, you think it's my turn to be "human" and so on. > But why did _you_ not be human and asked before using > our stuff? Ah, I know, it was a mistake... > At least in your opinion. If you won't accept that Marcus made a mistake, why should anyone assume that you didn't made a mistake with your public posting? You purposely attacked Marcus in public, for some strange reason. You did not do it to defend your license, because a private mail would have fixed the problem and you would have basically had your name attached in a nice way for the fact that Marcus had looked at your code. Instead, now, another Open Source developer has quit. You're no big man. You're main characteristic is 'bully'.