Message-Id: <200704052021.l35KLpYr017003@cvs.openbsd.org>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
cc: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>,
	Marcus Glocker <mglocker@openbsd.org>,
	Jon Simola <jsimola@gmail.com>,
	Theo de Raadt <deraadt@theos.com>,
	Stefano Brivio <stefano.brivio@polimi.it>,
	Martin Langer <martin-langer@gmx.de>,
	Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@gentoo.org>,
	Andreas Jaggi <andreas.jaggi@waterwave.ch>,
	Larry Finger <larry.finger@lwfinger.net>, Quaker.Fang@sun.com,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	Joseph Jezak <josejx@gentoo.org>,
	John Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	Greg kh <greg@kroah.com>, bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	license-violation@gpl-violations.org
Subject: Re: OpenBSD bcw: Possible GPL license violation issues 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 05 Apr 2007 14:54:38 EDT."
             <461545EE.8070305@garzik.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 14:21:51 -0600
From: Theo de Raadt <deraadt@cvs.openbsd.org>
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org

> This is a blatant misrepresentation of the emails you've been reading.

So you feel that Michael's "public scolding" approach was the common
sense approach?

I note that archives of license-violation@gpl-violations.org and other
such efforts show that hundreds of other "violations" have been
handled privately first, so it seems that this is the commonly
accepted way to handle these issues.

Or am I misrepresenting the history now too?

Or are you just jumping in with one line non-sequitours because that
is your role in the community?