Return-path: Received: from static-ip-62-75-166-246.inaddr.intergenia.de ([62.75.166.246]:43702 "EHLO vs166246.vserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753225AbXDET0A (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Apr 2007 15:26:00 -0400 From: Michael Buesch To: Theo de Raadt Subject: Re: OpenBSD bcw: Possible GPL license violation issues Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 21:25:11 +0200 Cc: Joseph Jezak , Stefano Brivio , Marcus Glocker , Jon Simola , Theo de Raadt , Martin Langer , Danny van Dyk , Andreas Jaggi , Larry Finger , Quaker.Fang@sun.com, Johannes Berg , John Linville , Greg kh , bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, license-violation@gpl-violations.org References: <200704051913.l35JDww5000087@cvs.openbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200704051913.l35JDww5000087@cvs.openbsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Message-Id: <200704052125.12599.mb@bu3sch.de> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thursday 05 April 2007 21:13, Theo de Raadt wrote: > I am not the only one with the belief that your process sucked. > And neither is the person below. Many people see it that way. > --- > From: Jason Dixon > Subject: Re: CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: src > Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 14:56:37 -0400 > To: source-changes@cvs.openbsd.org > X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) > X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at dixongroup.net > X-Loop: source-changes@openbsd.org > Precedence: list > Sender: owner-source-changes@openbsd.org > The way they chose to "notify" Marcus shows a complete lack of > respect for Marcus. The way OpenBSD folks used our code was a complete lack of respect for us. Fullstop. > As Theo expressed in the thread, there is NO > DOUBT that they would have notified a corporation privately. Why > would you treat an individual, working on the code out of their own > desire, with less respect? This is a lie. Read the whole thread again! -- Greetings Michael.