Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:57566 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753278AbXDEU1T (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Apr 2007 16:27:19 -0400 Message-ID: <46155B91.7080407@garzik.org> Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 16:26:57 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Theo de Raadt CC: Michael Buesch , Marcus Glocker , Jon Simola , Theo de Raadt , Stefano Brivio , Martin Langer , Danny van Dyk , Andreas Jaggi , Larry Finger , Quaker.Fang@sun.com, Johannes Berg , Joseph Jezak , John Linville , Greg kh , bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, license-violation@gpl-violations.org Subject: Re: OpenBSD bcw: Possible GPL license violation issues References: <200704052021.l35KLpYr017003@cvs.openbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200704052021.l35KLpYr017003@cvs.openbsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Theo de Raadt wrote: >> This is a blatant misrepresentation of the emails you've been reading. > > So you feel that Michael's "public scolding" approach was the common > sense approach? No, I do not. But you nonetheless misrepresented Michael's argument (which I quoted, and you then snipped). The items that were copied were more than merely "white space, variable names which are the same, or simple 'save the registers' algorithms". Jeff