Return-path: Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]:55840 "EHLO fencepost.gnu.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750962AbXDMA5N (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Apr 2007 20:57:13 -0400 Received: from proski by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HcA3p-0000Yn-7h for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 20:54:45 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx-mac80211: Fix machine checks on PPC with rev 1 PHYs From: Pavel Roskin To: "John W. Linville" Cc: Larry Finger , Michael Buesch , Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20070413000950.GC3470@tuxdriver.com> References: <461d0815.ip3FDr8RDQXyCT4U%Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> <20070413000950.GC3470@tuxdriver.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 20:57:05 -0400 Message-Id: <1176425825.2588.58.camel@dv> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 20:09 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > I added this patch to the Fedora rawhide kernels, but our Fedora QA > lead reports that he still has this crash: > > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233011 > > I had diagnosed this to be the same crash as this patch was supposed > to address. Was I in error? I also observed the machine check with the current mb branch this morning, although I didn't have a chance to capture it, so I wanted to reported it later when I would have the details. I was testing the patch on a G4 PowerMac. I also have a G3 PowerMac where I tested older versions, and I intend to test the current code on it as well. > Any thoughts? Apparently more changes are needed. I don't think the latest patch needs to be reverted. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin