Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:57689 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1767232AbXDEUjs (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 5 Apr 2007 16:39:48 -0400
Message-ID: <46155E82.2040808@garzik.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 16:39:30 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Theo de Raadt <deraadt@cvs.openbsd.org>
CC: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>,
	Marcus Glocker <mglocker@openbsd.org>,
	Jon Simola <jsimola@gmail.com>,
	Theo de Raadt <deraadt@theos.com>,
	Stefano Brivio <stefano.brivio@polimi.it>,
	Martin Langer <martin-langer@gmx.de>,
	Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@gentoo.org>,
	Andreas Jaggi <andreas.jaggi@waterwave.ch>,
	Larry Finger <larry.finger@lwfinger.net>, Quaker.Fang@sun.com,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	Joseph Jezak <josejx@gentoo.org>,
	John Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	Greg kh <greg@kroah.com>, bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	license-violation@gpl-violations.org
Subject: Re: OpenBSD bcw: Possible GPL license violation issues
References: <200704052028.l35KSeZF003479@cvs.openbsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <200704052028.l35KSeZF003479@cvs.openbsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> Theo de Raadt wrote:
>>>> This is a blatant misrepresentation of the emails you've been reading.
>>> So you feel that Michael's "public scolding" approach was the common
>>> sense approach?
>> No, I do not.
> 
> Why are you the first person in the entire GPL community to admit that
> what Michael did might have some problems?

<shrug>  Probably because of the confrontation tone of the entire 
thread.  Everybody's on the offensive, and not willing to admit mistakes.

A private email SHOULD be the first approach for a copyright issue like 
this, regardless of whether its a private person or a corp.


> Shall I keep replying until everyone gets it?

Whatever makes you happy :)


> <rest deleted, because the above line is so important>

Snipped?  I presume, then, you admit you are misrepresenting others' 
opinions in this thread.

	Jeff