Return-path: Received: from cvs.openbsd.org ([199.185.137.3]:37259 "EHLO cvs.openbsd.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1767416AbXDEX0r (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Apr 2007 19:26:47 -0400 Message-Id: <200704052323.l35NNgvS026227@cvs.openbsd.org> To: Johannes Berg cc: Stefano Brivio , "Luis R. Rodriguez" , Pavel Roskin , Michael Buesch , Joseph Jezak , Marcus Glocker , Jon Simola , Theo de Raadt , Martin Langer , Danny van Dyk , Andreas Jaggi , Larry Finger , Quaker.Fang@sun.com, John Linville , Greg kh , bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, license-violation@gpl-violations.org Subject: Re: OpenBSD bcw: Possible GPL license violation issues In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 06 Apr 2007 00:46:00 +0200." <1175813160.3489.35.camel@johannes.berg> Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:23:42 -0600 From: Theo de Raadt Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > > How does cooperation start, if the first statements are about theft > > and lies? > >=20 > > It doesn't. And you prefer it that way? > > Since "cooperation" in your terms seems to imply living quietly with > somebody blatantly stealing and relicensing code I guess the only > possible answer to that is "yes". Cooperation is based on mutual trust. We don't trust Linux people anymore.