Return-path: Received: from cvs.openbsd.org ([199.185.137.3]:46453 "EHLO cvs.openbsd.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1767162AbXDERoW (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Apr 2007 13:44:22 -0400 Message-Id: <200704051740.l35HeNtx029008@cvs.openbsd.org> To: Michael Buesch cc: Marcus Glocker , Jon Simola , Theo de Raadt , Stefano Brivio , Martin Langer , Danny van Dyk , Andreas Jaggi , Larry Finger , Quaker.Fang@sun.com, Johannes Berg , Joseph Jezak , John Linville , Greg kh , bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, license-violation@gpl-violations.org Subject: Re: OpenBSD bcw: Possible GPL license violation issues In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 05 Apr 2007 19:35:35 +0200." <200704051935.36264.mb@bu3sch.de> Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 11:40:23 -0600 From: Theo de Raadt Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > I'm sorry if the mail sounded too strong. This was not intentional. It sure as hell was intentional; the minute you assumed it was not an ACCIDENT, and you decided to go public, it became 100% intentional. You even gave him choices, and having brought it public, you were telling him to make that choice publically. Well, he has made the expected choice. A choice almost every person on this planet would make. > But I think I made a great effort to make this clear, though. > I am not out for blood. And I guess that makes it ok.