Return-path: Received: from sccrmhc14.comcast.net ([63.240.77.84]:34948 "EHLO sccrmhc14.comcast.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752960AbXDEA6G (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2007 20:58:06 -0400 Message-ID: <46144855.9020503@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 20:52:37 -0400 From: Joseph Jezak MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Theo de Raadt CC: Stefano Brivio , Michael Buesch , Marcus Glocker , Jon Simola , Theo de Raadt , Martin Langer , Danny van Dyk , Andreas Jaggi , Larry Finger , Quaker.Fang@sun.com, Johannes Berg , John Linville , Greg kh , bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, license-violation@gpl-violations.org Subject: Re: OpenBSD bcw: Possible GPL license violation issues References: <200704050029.l350TiP6025711@cvs.openbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200704050029.l350TiP6025711@cvs.openbsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > Johannes Berg > Joseph Jezak We are two members of the reverse engineering team as can be verified by looking at the specification. > This infighting between two teams trying to support the same chipset > is a complete mockery of the publicness of the original reverse > engineering effort. As one of the reverse engineers, the reason for the openness of writing the specification was to ensure that the Chinese Wall method was maintained. To date, I have not been contacted by any of the bcw programmers regarding clarification of the specification, but I would welcome any questions they might have. -Joe