Return-path: Received: from alnrmhc15.comcast.net ([204.127.225.95]:56906 "EHLO alnrmhc15.comcast.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752902AbXDECMj (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2007 22:12:39 -0400 Message-ID: <461459D6.2050806@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 22:07:18 -0400 From: Joseph Jezak MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Theo de Raadt CC: Stefano Brivio , Michael Buesch , Marcus Glocker , Jon Simola , Theo de Raadt , Martin Langer , Danny van Dyk , Andreas Jaggi , Larry Finger , Quaker.Fang@sun.com, Johannes Berg , John Linville , Greg kh , bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, license-violation@gpl-violations.org Subject: Re: OpenBSD bcw: Possible GPL license violation issues References: <200704050156.l351uhvX006182@cvs.openbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200704050156.l351uhvX006182@cvs.openbsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Theo de Raadt wrote: >>> Johannes Berg >>> Joseph Jezak >> We are two members of the reverse engineering team as can be >> verified by looking at the specification. > > And how exactly does seeing this public flogging involve you? > > Do you feel that Marcus should give up his efforts? > No. You seem to have deleted the portion of my email where I suggested that the bcw programmers should feel free to contact us (the reverse engineers) about any issues with implementing the specs as written. I've re-copied that text below: > To date, I have not been contacted by any of the bcw programmers > regarding clarification of the specification, but I would welcome > any questions they might have. -Joe