Return-path: Received: from static-ip-62-75-166-246.inaddr.intergenia.de ([62.75.166.246]:42729 "EHLO vs166246.vserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762798AbXEZQVX (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 May 2007 12:21:23 -0400 From: Michael Buesch To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 18:21:16 +0200 Cc: Uwe Bugla , Maximilian Engelhardt , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel" References: <20070524195616.234280@gmx.net> <200705261750.48816.mb@bu3sch.de> <20070526091309.0af20971.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20070526091309.0af20971.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200705261821.16355.mb@bu3sch.de> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Saturday 26 May 2007 18:13:09 Andrew Morton wrote: > > I already tried your -mm kernel, but it crashes on my machine > > for other reasons. (Yeah, I should look into them, too :P ) > > err, please do. Just the oops trace would be a start. Yes, I will look into it. I think it was related to my onboard RTL networking chip. When trying to bring it down, it oopses the machine. But I'm not sure what happens exactly, yet. I'll take a look at it. > > Andrew, is it possible that the breakage was introduced in the > > merge process somehow? Didn't the patch apply cleanly? Are there > > other changes to b44 I should know about in your tree? > > Only git-wireless.net modifies b44.c but if we're having IRQ assignment > problems then we'd need to look elsewhere. I think we don't have IRQ assignment problems. Uwe simply disabled b44-PCI support in his first bugreport (I guess). So there was no b44-PCI driver loaded. Later on he said that it does magically work now... -- Greetings Michael.