Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:45782 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763787AbXEUWQY (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2007 18:16:24 -0400 Message-ID: <46521A1C.8040708@garzik.org> Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 18:15:56 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Cohen, Guy" CC: Randy Dunlap , Christoph Hellwig , James Ketrenos , "John W. Linville" , linux-wireless , "Zhu, Yi" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add iwlwifi wireless drivers [part 2/2] References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Cohen, Guy wrote: > But at this point (we can't change the past nor the present), we would > like to focus on more urgent issues with iwlwifi in the immediate term > and delay a bit the big-endian support. Is this acceptable? Your internal schedule is your internal schedule. But as I previously stated, getting rid of the bitfields and using the proper (portable) Linux driver API is a hard merge requirement. Jeff