Return-path: Received: from dhost002-5.dex002.intermedia.net ([64.78.21.20]:42613 "EHLO dhost002-5.dex002.intermedia.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756263AbXEJRZu (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 May 2007 13:25:50 -0400 From: "Jouni Malinen" Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 10:26:03 -0700 To: Johannes Berg Cc: James Ketrenos , Jiri Benc , linux-wireless , "John W. Linville" , Michael Wu Subject: Re: Specifing rate control algorithm? Message-ID: <20070510172603.GF24712@devicescape.com> References: <464253CE.2030504@linux.intel.com> <20070510132756.2ca660a0@midnight.suse.cz> <46434596.6010908@linux.intel.com> <1178817104.3806.33.camel@johannes.berg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1178817104.3806.33.camel@johannes.berg> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 07:11:44PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > Why don't we just add a char *preferred_rate_control; to the hw > definition structure instead? That way, we can even show it in > sys/debugfs later so the user will still know what the driver preferred > after changing it. This would be my preference, too. -- Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA