Return-path: Received: from static-ip-62-75-166-246.inaddr.intergenia.de ([62.75.166.246]:35912 "EHLO vs166246.vserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933482AbXEFJmQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 May 2007 05:42:16 -0400 From: Michael Buesch To: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: Merging SSB upstream Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 11:41:18 +0200 Cc: John Linville , Andrew Morton , Gary Zambrano , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de References: <200705060303.17594.mb@bu3sch.de> <463D4770.9060903@garzik.org> In-Reply-To: <463D4770.9060903@garzik.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200705061141.18560.mb@bu3sch.de> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sunday 06 May 2007 05:11:44 Jeff Garzik wrote: > Michael Buesch wrote: > > So, now that mac80211 is merged upstream, I think it's > > time to merge SSB and the b44-ssb port upstream. > > Note that bcm43xx-mac80211 is _not_ ready for upstream, yet. > > > > What do you think? I'd like to merge ssb as-is, although > > the embedded-device parts are not quite finished, yet. > > But they don't interfere with the non-embedded parts used > > by b44 and the bcm43xx PCI cards. > > So we _could_ remove the ssb-mips code, but I don't like to > > do that for better maintainability. It doesn't hurt anyone IMO. > > What does Ralf (MIPS maintainer) and Gary (Broadcom maintainer) think? I don't know. I wanted to get all these opinions with this mail. :) > For my part, I'm not going to render even a tentative opinion without a > link to actual code. All code is in wireless tree drivers/ssb http://bu3sch.de/gitweb?p=wireless-dev.git;a=tree;f=drivers/ssb;h=681cd93bf166670efbdec471b78137d3d0f26537;hb=HEAD -- Greetings Michael.