Return-path: Received: from crystal.sipsolutions.net ([195.210.38.204]:60810 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755172AbXEJRJX (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 May 2007 13:09:23 -0400 Subject: Re: Specifing rate control algorithm? From: Johannes Berg To: James Ketrenos Cc: Jiri Benc , linux-wireless , "John W. Linville" , Michael Wu In-Reply-To: <46434596.6010908@linux.intel.com> References: <464253CE.2030504@linux.intel.com> <20070510132756.2ca660a0@midnight.suse.cz> <46434596.6010908@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-RHRaPd/lGxhAo4CN0PkI" Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 19:11:44 +0200 Message-Id: <1178817104.3806.33.camel@johannes.berg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-RHRaPd/lGxhAo4CN0PkI Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 09:17 -0700, James Ketrenos wrote: > This commit simply adds an optional rate control algorithm name > parameter to ieeee80211_register_hw. Why don't we just add a char *preferred_rate_control; to the hw definition structure instead? That way, we can even show it in sys/debugfs later so the user will still know what the driver preferred after changing it. johannes --=-RHRaPd/lGxhAo4CN0PkI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iD8DBQBGQ1JQ/ETPhpq3jKURAq+/AKCSRtUd4zb+BeSMg8nw7QO/errJTACfXYdE GUMLEo6bS00pDOHwlWCE7iM= =vXBZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-RHRaPd/lGxhAo4CN0PkI--