Return-path: Received: from static-ip-62-75-166-246.inaddr.intergenia.de ([62.75.166.246]:36360 "EHLO vs166246.vserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755477AbXEFBE2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 May 2007 21:04:28 -0400 From: Michael Buesch To: John Linville , Jeff Garzik Subject: Merging SSB upstream Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 03:03:17 +0200 Cc: Andrew Morton , Gary Zambrano , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-Id: <200705060303.17594.mb@bu3sch.de> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: So, now that mac80211 is merged upstream, I think it's time to merge SSB and the b44-ssb port upstream. Note that bcm43xx-mac80211 is _not_ ready for upstream, yet. What do you think? I'd like to merge ssb as-is, although the embedded-device parts are not quite finished, yet. But they don't interfere with the non-embedded parts used by b44 and the bcm43xx PCI cards. So we _could_ remove the ssb-mips code, but I don't like to do that for better maintainability. It doesn't hurt anyone IMO. Some opinions? -- Greetings Michael.