Return-path: Received: from static-ip-62-75-166-246.inaddr.intergenia.de ([62.75.166.246]:56042 "EHLO vs166246.vserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752783AbXEZVAp (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 May 2007 17:00:45 -0400 From: Michael Buesch To: Uwe Bugla Subject: Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 23:00:36 +0200 Cc: Larry Finger , Andrew Morton , Maximilian Engelhardt , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel References: <20070524195616.234280@gmx.net> <46589133.9010608@lwfinger.net> <200705262233.15529.uwe.bugla@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <200705262233.15529.uwe.bugla@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200705262300.36611.mb@bu3sch.de> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Saturday 26 May 2007 22:33:13 Uwe Bugla wrote: > Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:57 schrieben Sie: > > Uwe Bugla wrote: > > > OK, applied this one against 2.6.22-rc3, assuming a typo error by you, > > > Andrew. > > > > > > Result is: No change: non functionable b44 device! > > > > Could you please send the following: > > > > 1. the output of lsmod from the non-functioning kernel > > Nonsense! > As I stated already, both modules (i. e. b44 and ssb) are loaded correctly. > So please read the thread before you post that, not vice versa! Ok, Uwe. Now I show you some real life examples how you and how someone who is polite answers to the same question: You: > Nonsense! > As I stated already, both modules (i. e. b44 and ssb) are loaded correctly. > So please read the thread before you post that, not vice versa! > They are already in the thread. So please leave me alone with those lazy > hints! Read bfore you post, not vice versa! Someone who is polite: > They are already in the thread. So you see the difference? And do you see why everybody in this thread is so pissed about you? -- Greetings Michael.