Return-path: Received: from static-ip-62-75-166-246.inaddr.intergenia.de ([62.75.166.246]:36310 "EHLO vs166246.vserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933506AbXEFJpA (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 May 2007 05:45:00 -0400 From: Michael Buesch To: "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: Merging SSB upstream Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 11:44:27 +0200 Cc: Jeff Garzik , Andrew Morton , Gary Zambrano , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de, ralf@linux-mips.org References: <200705060303.17594.mb@bu3sch.de> <20070506020051.GA30917@tuxdriver.com> In-Reply-To: <20070506020051.GA30917@tuxdriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200705061144.27817.mb@bu3sch.de> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sunday 06 May 2007 04:00:51 John W. Linville wrote: > On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 03:03:17AM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > > So, now that mac80211 is merged upstream, I think it's > > time to merge SSB and the b44-ssb port upstream. > > Note that bcm43xx-mac80211 is _not_ ready for upstream, yet. > > ACK, unfortunately. > > > What do you think? I'd like to merge ssb as-is, although > > the embedded-device parts are not quite finished, yet. > > But they don't interfere with the non-embedded parts used > > by b44 and the bcm43xx PCI cards. > > How much testing have you (and others) done w/ b44? Well, it works for me with my b44 card I got from broadcom. There are really only 2 or 3 different b44 cards, so chances are damn high it will work for all. > I had to remove > the b44 ssb changes from fedora because a) users reported problems; Which problems were that? The 2 compile issues? Trivial to fix if that's the only issue. ;) -- Greetings Michael.