Return-path: Received: from crystal.sipsolutions.net ([195.210.38.204]:47668 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S938268AbXFHHXK (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jun 2007 03:23:10 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mac80211: add IEEE802.11e/WMM structures From: Johannes Berg To: Zhu Yi Cc: Jiri Benc , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, "John W. Linville" , Michael Wu In-Reply-To: <1181266477.3039.97.camel@debian.sh.intel.com> References: <20070606082210.GA28649@mail.intel.com> <20070607223058.44122be4@griffin.suse.cz> <1181266477.3039.97.camel@debian.sh.intel.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-KL9vklekKc0wW6Hnxr+N" Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 09:23:25 +0200 Message-Id: <1181287405.6533.4.camel@johannes.berg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-KL9vklekKc0wW6Hnxr+N Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 09:34 +0800, Zhu Yi wrote: > I think we have talked this early and now you know correctly WIFI is not > a trademark. You define IEEE80211_STYPE_ASSOC_REQ, etc, but defines > those for Wi-Fi with WLAN prefix? WLAN prefix should be used by symbols > defined by mac80211, for example: WLAN_CAPABILITY_ESS. FWIW, I agree, and not using WIFI_ because it might be a trademark... Jiri, feel free to put a note in the header that "all mentioned names may be trademarks of their respective owners" or something, but something that is defined by the wifi alliance should reasonably be called WIFI_... too. johannes --=-KL9vklekKc0wW6Hnxr+N Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iD8DBQBGaQPt/ETPhpq3jKURAga1AJ90SRwH+KqqgWk5270Rx1d3qqu9dwCfWW9/ 7JSGTpXTpz9uYFCGLeAtQKg= =7UZC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-KL9vklekKc0wW6Hnxr+N--