Return-path: Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.21]:3696 "EHLO orsmga101.jf.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755118AbXFGVgS (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2007 17:36:18 -0400 Message-ID: <4668DE0F.7060302@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 21:41:51 -0700 From: jketreno MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Wu CC: Jiri Benc , "John W. Linville" , yi.zhu@intel.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: IEEE802.11e/WMM TS management and DLS support References: <20070606082152.GA28639@mail.intel.com> <20070607224315.6dadffca@griffin.suse.cz> <4668D293.1010908@linux.intel.com> <200706071412.54918.flamingice@sourmilk.net> In-Reply-To: <200706071412.54918.flamingice@sourmilk.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Michael Wu wrote: > On Thursday 07 June 2007 20:52, jketreno wrote: >> Or better yet, let's develop them as a community by submitting patches to >> fix them. >> > Easier to ask forgiveness than to get permission, eh? > > No thanks. Forgiveness for what? In addition to the updated patches against wireless-dev incorporating feedback, John asked Yi to provide the WME patches against Linus' tree. He did.. Now, a month after Yi's patches were originally sent out, Jiri cited things he doesn't like--things which can be addressed through patches to the code vs. having to re-apply a monolithic patch. Nothing is perfect the first time--and nothing will ever get done so long as an aggressive and offensive position is held in regard to outside contribution. James > > -Michael Wu