Return-path: Received: from ebb.errno.com ([69.12.149.25]:4343 "EHLO ebb.errno.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753185AbXFUW0y (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jun 2007 18:26:54 -0400 Message-ID: <467AFB5F.6050100@errno.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:27:43 -0700 From: Sam Leffler MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andy Green CC: Johannes Berg , linux-wireless Subject: Re: radiotap for TX References: <1182375853.3714.103.camel@johannes.berg> <467AE460.1070606@errno.com> <467AE9D8.2030602@warmcat.com> In-Reply-To: <467AE9D8.2030602@warmcat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: [radiotap mailing list dropped since it is members only] Andy Green wrote: > Sam Leffler wrote: > >> Note that using a monitor mode interface for transmit is a bad idea. It >> is likely you will encounter devices that disallow any packet transmit >> when operating in monitor mode. In practice this can be worked around >> by using a non-monitor operating mode for the device (e.g. adhoc mode >> w/o setting up beacons) but exporting this notion to user mode is bad >> IMO. In net80211 there is an adhoc-demo mode which is essentially adhoc >> mode which was originally added for functionality found in old lucent >> cards but more recently has been used for building applications that >> want a "raw 802.11 device". > > Hi - > > In mac80211 you can run multiple network interfaces off the one physical > device, so you can have an associated WPA connection on one network > interface and another logical "monitor mode" network interface up on the > one physical device. "Monitor mode" in this case can be the results of > a promiscuous hardware RX that is filtered for the Managed mode logical > interface ... this is AIUI. So in that way "Monitor Mode" no longer > means a single modal device setting, but really the delivery somehow of > packets to a logical network interface that belongs to the physical device. I've had working vap code for >3 years. > > Injecting down a "monitor mode interface" then only means to use a > logical network interface that locally is configured to "Monitor Mode", > it doesn't have the same definite implication for physical device > configuration as before mac80211. (Well.. AIUI). So hopefully this > objection may not apply. As I described, some devices may allow rx-only operation on channels otherwise disallowed by regulatory constraints. As such overloading monitor operation with transmit is just a bad idea if you want to take full advantage of what h/w provides. I'm just suggesting that you're defining an abstraction that's going to get you into trouble. Sam